GPIQ ranks 2nd and QYLG 4th of 31 funds in the Nasdaq-100 Option Income Category.
GPIQ vs QYLG
94.1%by weight
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.35%0.35%
GPIQ 30.9×the volume
1.5M48.7K
GPIQ vs QYLG Performance
+18.6%+19.8%
- GPIQ 0.35%
- QYLG 0.35%
- GPIQ $6.38B
- QYLG $189M
- GPIQ +18.6%
- QYLG +19.8%, better
- GPIQ 10.38%
- QYLG 17.20%, better
- GPIQ 102
- QYLG 103
- GPIQ 1.5M sh, better
- QYLG 48.7K sh
- GPIQ $56.82
- QYLG $30.28
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GPIQ | QYLG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A87 | A87 |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C54 | A71Higher |
| Tradability | A80Higher | C48 |
| Holdings | A74 | A74 |
| Durability | A78Higher | B67 |
Rank among Nasdaq-100 Option Income funds
Same Category. GPIQ and QYLG are both graded against the same 31 Nasdaq-100 Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GPIQA
QYLGA
In short
GPIQ Goldman's Nasdaq-100 income build: own the index, sell calls dynamically rather than blanket the whole book, collect a monthly check. The fee lands well under what this corner of the market typically charges.
QYLG Covered calls, but only on half the book. QYLG owns the Nasdaq-100 and sells at-the-money calls on roughly 50% of the portfolio, trading away half the index's upside for monthly option income instead of all of it.
Stated mandate
GPIQ The Fund seeks current income while maintaining prospects for capital appreciation. It provides Nasdaq-100 equity exposure and dynamically sells call options while seeking participation in rising markets.
QYLG QYLG combines exposure to Nasdaq-100 stocks with a covered-call program on approximately half of the portfolio. The strategy is intended to provide income while retaining some upside participation.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GPIQ vs QYLG Holdings
Overlap
94.1%
- 7
- 95
- 8
Holdings side by side
| Holding | GPIQ | QYLG |
|---|---|---|
| NVDA | 8.11% | 8.38% |
| AAPL | 7.73% | 7.64% |
| MSFT | 6.19% | 6.17% |
| MU | 4.49% | 4.74% |
| AMZN | 4.18% | 4.30% |
| AMD | 3.95% | 4.11% |
| GOOGL | 3.98% | 3.18% |
| META | 3.43% | 3.39% |
| TSLA | 2.86% | 3.05% |
| SPCX | 2.73% | 2.97% |
Sectors
GPIQQYLGSame weight
- TechnologyGPIQ 60.7%QYLG 60.4%
- Consumer DiscretionaryGPIQ 9.9%QYLG 10.1%
- UtilitiesGPIQ 0.9%QYLG 1.0%
GPIQ vs QYLG Cost
- 0.35%GPIQ
- 0.35%QYLG
- Middle half of Nasdaq-100 Option Income funds
- Median 0.68%
GPIQ 3rd cheapest of 31 funds
QYLG 3rd cheapest of 31 funds
GPIQ vs QYLG Dividends
- GPIQ 10.38%
- QYLG 17.20%, better
- GPIQ $5.77
- QYLG $5.09
- GPIQ $0.51
- QYLG $0.14
- GPIQ Oct 1, 2026
- QYLG Sep 21, 2026
- GPIQ Oct 7, 2026
- QYLG Sep 24, 2026
- GPIQ Monthly
- QYLG Monthly
Distribution history
GPIQ vs QYLG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GPIQ 14.1%QYLG 11.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- GPIQ 1.43QYLG 1.41
- Worst fall
- GPIQ −21.1%QYLG −30.0%
- Market sensitivity
- GPIQ 1.16QYLG 0.94
GPIQ and QYLG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.35% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.



