Skip to content

QYLD vs QYLG

Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF

QYLDANasdaq

Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF

QYLGANasdaq

Overlap

99.8%by weight

Expense ratio

QYLG −0.25pt a year

QYLD0.60%QYLG0.35%

Avg volume · 30D

QYLD 87.4×the volume

QYLD4.59MQYLG52.6K

5Y return · a year

QYLG +2.4pt

QYLD+7.5%QYLG+9.9%

QYLD vs QYLG Performance

Nov 9, 2021 – Nov 9, 2026

+43.3%QYLD+60.2%QYLG

Nov 9, 2021 to Nov 9, 2026. QYLD +43.3%. QYLG +60.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%20%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026
Expense ratio
QYLD 0.60%
QYLG 0.35%, better
Fund size
QYLD $7.84B
QYLG $177M
1Y total return
QYLD +14.8%, better
QYLG +13.6%
Yield (12M)
QYLD 12.11%
QYLG 17.65%, better
Holdings
QYLD 103
QYLG 103
Avg volume (30D)
QYLD 4.59M sh, better
QYLG 52.6K sh
NAV per share
QYLD $17.11
QYLG $27.46
52W range

ETF.net Grade

QYLD: Cost 65, Risk 71, Mission 100, Tradability 90, Holdings 73, Durability 91. QYLG: Cost 82, Risk 66, Mission 96, Tradability 51, Holdings 73, Durability 67.
Pillar letters and Scores for QYLD, QYLG, with each pillar’s weight
PillarQYLDQYLG
Cost30% weightB65A82Higher
Mission25% weightA100HigherA96
Risk15% weightA71HigherB66
Tradability15% weightA90HigherC51
Holdings10% weightA73A73
Durability5% weightA91HigherB67

Rank among Nasdaq-100 Option Income funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. QYLD and QYLG are both graded against the same 30 Nasdaq-100 Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Nasdaq-100 Option Income⁠

Category · 30 funds
See all 30 ›

QYLD ranks 2nd and QYLG 5th of 30 funds in the Nasdaq-100 Option Income Category.

  1. Rank 1AQQAInvesco QQQ Income Advantage ETFScore 82
  2. Rank 2AGPIQGoldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETFScore 80
  3. Rank 2AQYLDGlobal X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETFScore 80
  4. Rank 4AJEPQJPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETFScore 79
  5. Rank 5AQYLGGlobal X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETFScore 76
  6. Rank 6AQQQINEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETFScore 73

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

QYLDAGlobal X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF

QYLGAGlobal X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF

In short

QYLD Running since 2013, QYLD is the no-frills version of the Nasdaq-100 income trade: own the index, sell calls against it, pay out monthly. No stock picking, no manager discretion, just a rules-based buy-write index followed closely.

QYLG Covered calls, but only on half the book. QYLG owns the Nasdaq-100 and sells at-the-money calls on roughly 50% of the portfolio, trading away half the index's upside for monthly option income instead of all of it.

Stated mandate

QYLD QYLD seeks, before fees and expenses, to generally match the price and yield performance of the Cboe NASDAQ-100® BuyWrite V2 Index. It uses a buy-write strategy that holds NASDAQ-100 stocks and sells corresponding call options.

QYLG QYLG combines exposure to Nasdaq-100 stocks with a covered-call program on approximately half of the portfolio. The strategy is intended to provide income while retaining some upside participation.

Why people hold it

  • QYLD Simple machine: holds Nasdaq-100 stocks, sells the matching calls, and tracks the Cboe NASDAQ-100 BuyWrite V2 Index closely. Nothing to second-guess.
  • Income arrives monthly, and the 0.60% fee sits under the median for Nasdaq-100 options-income funds.
  • A multi-billion-dollar fund that trades very actively, so getting in and out is rarely the hard part.
  • QYLG Calls cover about half the portfolio, so the unwritten half keeps full participation in Nasdaq-100 moves instead of getting capped every month.globalxetfs.com
  • A 0.35% expense ratio undercuts most Nasdaq-100 option-income funds, including Global X's own full-overwrite sibling QYLD.
  • Rules-based, not discretionary: it follows the Cboe Nasdaq-100 Half BuyWrite V2 Index, and its delivery of that stated mandate sits in the top quartile of its peer group.globalxetfs.com
  • Distributions run monthly, a cadence the fund has kept since its 2020 launch.globalxetfs.com

Worth knowing

  • QYLD Writing calls sells the upside. When the Nasdaq-100 runs past the strike, that gain goes to the option buyer, not the fund.
  • Leaner options on the same index: QQA at 0.33%, GPIQ and JEPQ at 0.35%.
  • Payouts are funded by option premium and no target rate is declared, so the monthly check varies with volatility.
  • QYLG Half the overwrite, roughly half the premium: by design this generates less income than a full covered-call fund like QYLD writing on the whole portfolio.globalxetfs.com
  • The written half uses at-the-money calls, so that slice's gains stop at the strike in a hot month. Premium collected rises and falls with volatility.globalxetfs.com
  • Assets and daily volume are modest next to the category's heavyweights, so bid-ask spreads matter more on larger orders.

Full QYLD profile⁠

Full QYLG profile⁠

QYLD vs QYLG Holdings

How QYLD and QYLG differ

Overlap by weight

99.8%

Shared holdings make up 99.9% of QYLG and 99.9% of QYLD.

About this figure: QYLD earns income from options, which aren’t counted.

QYLG earns income from options, which aren’t counted.

Level by level

  • Sector10 Sectors96.8%
  • Asset classStocks100%
  • Countryby domicile99.9%
  • Holdings102 in both99.8%

Sector

Sector weights in QYLD and QYLG, widest gap first
SectorMore in QYLDMore in QYLGGap
TechnologyQYLD +3.2 points
CommunicationQYLG +1.0 points
Consumer DiscretionaryQYLG +0.8 points
Consumer StaplesQYLG +0.7 points
Health CareQYLG +0.4 points
IndustrialsQYLG +0.1 points
MaterialsQYLG +0.1 points
EnergySame weight
UtilitiesSame weight
FinancialsSame weight

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in QYLD and QYLG, widest gap first
CountryMore in QYLDMore in QYLGGap
United StatesSame weight
CanadaQYLD +0.1 points
NetherlandsSame weight
BrazilSame weight
ChinaSame weight
United KingdomSame weight

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • QYLD47.0%
  • QYLG47.0%

Securities held

  • QYLD102
  • QYLG102

Asset class

QYLD
Stocks
QYLG
Stocks

Holdings

  • Only in QYLD0
  • In both102
  • Only in QYLG0

Only in QYLD

0 securities, 0.0% of QYLD by weight

Only in QYLG

0 securities, 0.0% of QYLG by weight

Weight gaps

The 100 widest of 102 Holdings in both funds.

Holding weights in QYLD and QYLG, widest gap first
HoldingMore in QYLDMore in QYLGGap
Asml Holding Nv-Ny Reg ShsASMLQYLD +0.01 points
Intuit IncINTUQYLG +0.01 points
Pdd Holdings IncPDDQYLG +0.01 points
Cadence Design Sys IncCDNSQYLG +0.01 points
Moderna IncMRNAQYLG +0.01 points
Nxp Semiconductors NVNXPIQYLG +0.01 points
Applovin Corp-Class AAPPQYLG +0.01 points
Vertex Pharmaceuticals IncVRTXQYLD +0.01 points

All 102 QYLD holdings⁠All 102 QYLG holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

QYLD vs QYLG Cost

Overpaying QYLD vs QYLG

$4,691

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • QYLD 0.60%

    $11,817

  • QYLG 0.35%

    $7,126

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • QYLD 0.60%
  • QYLG 0.35%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530QYLD $11,817QYLG $7,126

Year by year

YearQYLDQYLGOverpaying
10$1,076$634$442
20$4,116$2,454$1,662
30$11,817$7,126$4,691

Expense ratio

  • 0.60%QYLD
  • 0.35%QYLG, cheaper
  • Middle half of Nasdaq-100 Option Income funds
  • Median 0.71%

QYLG 4th cheapest of 30 funds

QYLD 10th cheapest of 30 funds

QYLD vs QYLG Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Yield (12M)
QYLD 12.11%
QYLG 17.65%, better
Payout (12M)
QYLD $2.14
QYLG $5.02
Last payment
QYLD $0.18
QYLG $0.17
Ex-dividend
QYLD Oct 19, 2026
QYLG Oct 19, 2026
Paid on
QYLD Oct 22, 2026
QYLG Oct 22, 2026
Frequency
QYLD Monthly
QYLG Monthly

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

QYLDMonthly · 46 paymentsAll QYLD payments⁠
One bar per payment. 46 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Jan 23, 2023 $0.17; Feb 21, 2023 $0.17; Mar 20, 2023 $0.17; Apr 24, 2023 $0.17; May 22, 2023 $0.17; Jun 20, 2023 $0.18; Jul 24, 2023 $0.18; Aug 21, 2023 $0.17; Sep 18, 2023 $0.17; Oct 23, 2023 $0.17; Nov 20, 2023 $0.16; Dec 28, 2023 $0.17; Jan 22, 2024 $0.18; Feb 20, 2024 $0.18; Mar 18, 2024 $0.18; Apr 22, 2024 $0.17; May 20, 2024 $0.16; Jun 24, 2024 $0.17; Jul 22, 2024 $0.18; Aug 19, 2024 $0.18; Sep 23, 2024 $0.18; Oct 21, 2024 $0.18; Nov 18, 2024 $0.18; Dec 30, 2024 $0.34; Jan 21, 2025 $0.19; Feb 24, 2025 $0.17; Mar 24, 2025 $0.17; Apr 21, 2025 $0.16; May 19, 2025 $0.17; Jun 23, 2025 $0.17; Jul 21, 2025 $0.17; Aug 18, 2025 $0.17; Sep 22, 2025 $0.17; Oct 20, 2025 $0.17; Nov 24, 2025 $0.17; Dec 22, 2025 $0.18; Jan 20, 2026 $0.18; Feb 23, 2026 $0.18; Mar 23, 2026 $0.17; Apr 20, 2026 $0.18; May 18, 2026 $0.18; Jun 22, 2026 $0.19; Jul 20, 2026 $0.18; Aug 24, 2026 $0.18; Sep 21, 2026 $0.18; Oct 19, 2026 $0.18. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$520232026YTD
QYLGMonthly · 47 paymentsAll QYLG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 47 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Jan 23, 2023 $0.11; Feb 21, 2023 $0.12; Mar 20, 2023 $0.12; Apr 24, 2023 $0.13; May 22, 2023 $0.12; Jun 20, 2023 $0.14; Jul 24, 2023 $0.14; Aug 21, 2023 $0.13; Sep 18, 2023 $0.14; Oct 23, 2023 $0.13; Nov 20, 2023 $0.13; Dec 28, 2023 $0.14; Jan 22, 2024 $0.15; Feb 20, 2024 $0.15; Mar 18, 2024 $0.16; Apr 22, 2024 $0.15; May 20, 2024 $0.14; Jun 24, 2024 $0.14; Jul 22, 2024 $0.17; Aug 19, 2024 $0.20; Sep 23, 2024 $0.18; Oct 21, 2024 $0.19; Nov 18, 2024 $0.18; Dec 30, 2024 $5.30; Jan 21, 2025 $0.16; Feb 24, 2025 $0.13; Mar 24, 2025 $0.16; Apr 21, 2025 $0.23; May 19, 2025 $0.18; Jun 23, 2025 $0.16; Jul 21, 2025 $0.14; Aug 18, 2025 $0.14; Sep 22, 2025 $0.14; Oct 20, 2025 $0.24; Nov 24, 2025 $0.28; Dec 22, 2025 $0.16; Dec 30, 2025 $2.78; Jan 20, 2026 $0.16; Feb 23, 2026 $0.15; Mar 23, 2026 $0.18; Apr 20, 2026 $0.15; May 18, 2026 $0.21; Jun 22, 2026 $0.21; Jul 20, 2026 $0.27; Aug 24, 2026 $0.17; Sep 21, 2026 $0.14; Oct 19, 2026 $0.17. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$520232026YTD

QYLD vs QYLG Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • QYLD
  • QYLG
Nov 9, 2021 to Nov 9, 2026. Worst fall: QYLG −30.0% · Oct 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−30%−20%−10%0%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
QYLD 8.1%, betterQYLG 12.4%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
QYLD 1.31, betterQYLG 1.27
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
QYLD −24.6%, betterQYLG −30.0%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
QYLD 0.48QYLG 0.94

QYLD and QYLG in the news

Popular comparisons

  • QYLDAvsJEPQA

    Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF · JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QYLGAvsQQAA

    Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF · Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.29%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QYLDAvsQQQIA

    Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF · NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.68%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QYLGAvsGPIQA

    Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF · Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.29%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QYLDAvsGPIQA

    Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF · Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.29%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QYLGAvsJEPQA

    Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF · JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.