GPIX ranks 4th and NBOS 15th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Option Income Category.
GPIX vs NBOS
GPIX −0.30pt a year
0.29%0.59%
GPIX 10.8×the volume
1.17M108K
GPIX vs NBOS Performance
+14.2%+13.5%
- GPIX 0.29%, better
- NBOS 0.59%
- GPIX $6.33B
- NBOS $535M
- GPIX +14.2%, better
- NBOS +13.5%
- GPIX 8.43%, better
- NBOS 8.30%
- GPIX 494
- NBOS 11
- GPIX 1.17M sh, better
- NBOS 108K sh
- GPIX $53.34
- NBOS $27.77
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GPIX | NBOS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A89Higher | B55 |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C47 | B66Higher |
| Tradability | B59Higher | C47 |
| Holdings | A74 | |
| Durability | A78Higher | B62 |
Rank among S&P 500 Option Income funds
Same Category. GPIX and NBOS are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GPIXA
NBOSB
In short
GPIX Most option-income funds sell the whole rally for yield. GPIX is written to ask for both: current income and preserved prospects for capital appreciation, on a roughly 500-stock S&P 500 core, at 0.35%, paid monthly.
NBOS Most options-income ETFs sell calls on stocks they already own. NBOS flips the trade: it sells collateralized puts on the S&P 500 and parks the collateral in bonds, so premium, not dividends, does the work.
Stated mandate
GPIX The Fund seeks current income while preserving prospects for capital appreciation. It invests primarily in benchmark-related stocks and sells call options providing exposure to the benchmark to generate premium income.
NBOS The Fund seeks long-term capital growth and income mainly by selling collateralized puts on U.S. indices, including the S&P 500 and related S&P 500 suite indices, while investing collateral in fixed-income instruments intended to moderate volatility.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GPIX vs NBOS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GPIX vs NBOS Cost
Overpaying NBOS vs GPIX
$5,683
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GPIX 0.29%
$5,952
NBOS 0.59%
$11,635
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GPIX | NBOS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $527 | $1,058 | $531 |
| 20 | $2,044 | $4,051 | $2,007 |
| 30 | $5,952 | $11,635 | $5,683 |
- 0.29%GPIX, cheaper
- 0.59%NBOS
- Middle half of S&P 500 Option Income funds
- Median 0.60%
GPIX 5th cheapest of 51 funds
NBOS 24th cheapest of 51 funds
GPIX vs NBOS Dividends
- GPIX 8.43%, better
- NBOS 8.30%
- GPIX $4.60
- NBOS $2.35
- GPIX $0.39
- NBOS $0.22
- GPIX Nov 2, 2026
- NBOS Oct 27, 2026
- GPIX Nov 6, 2026
- NBOS Oct 30, 2026
- GPIX Monthly
- NBOS Monthly
Distribution history
GPIX vs NBOS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GPIX 10.4%NBOS 5.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- GPIX 1.49NBOS 1.39
- Worst fall
- GPIX −17.5%NBOS −12.7%
- Market sensitivity
- GPIX 0.84NBOS 0.39
GPIX and NBOS in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.29% · 0.68%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.38%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.38%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
