GPZ ranks 2nd and XOVR 4th of 12 funds in the Listed Private Markets Category.
GPZ vs XOVR
GPZ −0.43pt a year
0.40%0.83%
XOVR 19.5×the volume
214K4.17M
GPZ vs XOVR Performance
−11.7%−7.0%
- GPZ 0.40%, better
- XOVR 0.83%
- GPZ $251M
- XOVR $1.39B
- GPZ −11.7%
- XOVR −7.0%, better
- GPZ
- XOVR 0.00%
- GPZ 24
- XOVR 33
- GPZ 214K sh
- XOVR 4.17M sh, better
- GPZ $22.54
- XOVR $19.93
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GPZ | XOVR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A96Higher | A76 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | F21 | D26Higher |
| Tradability | B66Higher | B59 |
| Holdings | C50Higher | D37 |
| Durability | B55 | A72Higher |
Rank among Listed Private Markets funds
Same Category. GPZ and XOVR are both graded against the same 12 Listed Private Markets funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GPZB
XOVRB
In short
GPZ Private markets, bought from the fee-collecting side. GPZ tracks an index of the publicly listed firms that run buyout, credit and real-asset funds, rather than the deals themselves, for 0.40% a year.
XOVR A regular brokerage account, a slice of SpaceX. XOVR wraps about 30 public growth names around select late-stage private stakes held through special-purpose vehicles, with no accredited-investor hoops. Fee: 1.81%, no waiver.
Stated mandate
GPZ GPZ seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the MarketVector Alternative Asset Managers Index, providing public-equity exposure to alternative asset managers across private-market segments.
XOVR The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through a broader crossover strategy combining public equities with select private-company exposure.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GPZ vs XOVR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GPZ vs XOVR Cost
Overpaying XOVR vs GPZ
$7,769
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GPZ 0.40%
$8,090
XOVR 0.83%
$15,859
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GPZ | XOVR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $723 | $1,474 | $751 |
| 20 | $2,793 | $5,581 | $2,788 |
| 30 | $8,090 | $15,859 | $7,769 |
- 0.40%GPZ, cheaper
- 0.83%XOVR
- Middle half of Listed Private Markets funds
- Median 2.25%
GPZ cheapest of 12 funds
XOVR 3rd cheapest of 12 funds
GPZ vs XOVR Dividends
- GPZ
- XOVR 0.00%
- GPZ
- XOVR None
- GPZ $0.22
- XOVR
- GPZ Dec 22, 2025
- XOVR
- GPZ Dec 26, 2025
- XOVR
- GPZ Irregular
- XOVR
Distribution history
GPZ vs XOVR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GPZ 27.5%XOVR 24.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- GPZ −0.42XOVR 0.43
- Worst fall
- GPZ −31.7%XOVR −25.2%
- Market sensitivity
- GPZ 0.85XOVR 1.20
GPZ and XOVR in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.40% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.83% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.83% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 1.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.83% · 1.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


