Skip to content

GPZ vs XOVR

VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF

GPZBNYSE Arca

ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF

XOVRBNasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

GPZ −0.43pt a year

GPZ0.40%XOVR0.83%

Avg volume · 30D

XOVR 19.5×the volume

GPZ214KXOVR4.17M

GPZ vs XOVR Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

−11.7%GPZ−7.0%XOVR

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. GPZ −11.7%. XOVR −7.0%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%10%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
GPZ 0.40%, better
XOVR 0.83%
Fund size
GPZ $251M
XOVR $1.39B
1Y total return
GPZ −11.7%
XOVR −7.0%, better
Yield (12M)
GPZ No data
XOVR 0.00%
Holdings
GPZ 24
XOVR 33
Avg volume (30D)
GPZ 214K sh
XOVR 4.17M sh, better
NAV per share
GPZ $22.54
XOVR $19.93
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GPZ: Cost 96, Risk 21, Mission not scored, Tradability 66, Holdings 50, Durability 55. XOVR: Cost 76, Risk 26, Mission not scored, Tradability 59, Holdings 37, Durability 72.
Pillar letters and Scores for GPZ, XOVR, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGPZXOVR
Cost30% weightA96HigherA76
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightF21D26Higher
Tradability15% weightB66HigherB59
Holdings10% weightC50HigherD37
Durability5% weightB55A72Higher

Rank among Listed Private Markets funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GPZ and XOVR are both graded against the same 12 Listed Private Markets funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Listed Private Markets⁠

Category · 12 funds
See all 12 ›

GPZ ranks 2nd and XOVR 4th of 12 funds in the Listed Private Markets Category.

  1. Rank 1AGTPEGoldman Sachs MSCI World Private Equity Return Tracker ETFScore 72
  2. Rank 2BGPZVanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETFScore 66
  3. Rank 3BBUYOKraneShares Man Buyout Beta Index ETFScore 63
  4. Rank 4BXOVRERShares Private-Public Crossover ETFScore 57
  5. Rank 5CPSPInvesco Global Listed Private Equity ETFScore 53

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GPZBVanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF

XOVRBERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF

In short

GPZ Private markets, bought from the fee-collecting side. GPZ tracks an index of the publicly listed firms that run buyout, credit and real-asset funds, rather than the deals themselves, for 0.40% a year.

XOVR A regular brokerage account, a slice of SpaceX. XOVR wraps about 30 public growth names around select late-stage private stakes held through special-purpose vehicles, with no accredited-investor hoops. Fee: 1.81%, no waiver.

Stated mandate

GPZ GPZ seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the MarketVector Alternative Asset Managers Index, providing public-equity exposure to alternative asset managers across private-market segments.

XOVR The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through a broader crossover strategy combining public equities with select private-company exposure.

Why people hold it

  • GPZ 0.40% a year in a corner of the market that usually charges like the managers it holds: cohort peers PSP (1.80%) and BUYO (0.89%) both cost more for listed private-markets exposure.
  • Clean mechanism: it tracks the MarketVector Alternative Asset Managers Index for public-equity exposure to alternative managers across private-market segments. Rules, not a stock picker's hunches.vaneck.com
  • One of the sturdier implementations in the small listed private-markets group, and it gets there on cost and structure rather than exotic wrappers.
  • XOVR Roughly 30 listed growth names plus stakes in late-stage private companies like SpaceX, held through special-purpose vehicles inside a 1940 Act ETF.prnewswire.com
  • No accredited-investor status, capital calls or lockups. Private-market access arrives in a brokerage account, which is the structure's whole reason to exist.prnewswire.com
  • 1.81%, no waiver. Steep next to index funds, yet below the median for listed private-markets funds, a category where BIZD's 9.69% marks the high end.
  • A billion-dollar-plus fund that trades actively, unusual for a niche thematic strategy, and listed since 2017.

Worth knowing

  • GPZ One industry, and a 2025 launch. Early price swings have run high for its group, and there is only a short live record to judge the fund by.
  • Distributions come annually or semiannually, so this is an equity-growth wrapper rather than an income schedule you can plan around.
  • Still a smaller, moderately traded fund. Spreads can be wider than in mega-cap index ETFs, which matters most on large or hurried orders.
  • XOVR Private stakes have no closing price. They are marked by the fund's valuation process and can reprice on a funding round or an IPO rather than day to day.
  • About 30 holdings, with the private sleeve concentrated in a single name, so one company's mark can move the fund more than a broad equity ETF would.prnewswire.com
  • Cheaper shelf-mates exist, GPZ at 0.40% and GTPE at 0.50%, but neither is built around direct late-stage private stakes.

Full GPZ profile⁠

Full XOVR profile⁠

GPZ vs XOVR Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GPZ vs XOVR Cost

Overpaying XOVR vs GPZ

$7,769

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GPZ 0.40%

    $8,090

  • XOVR 0.83%

    $15,859

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GPZ 0.40%
  • XOVR 0.83%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530XOVR $15,859GPZ $8,090

Year by year

YearGPZXOVROverpaying
10$723$1,474$751
20$2,793$5,581$2,788
30$8,090$15,859$7,769

Expense ratio

  • 0.40%GPZ, cheaper
  • 0.83%XOVR
  • Middle half of Listed Private Markets funds
  • Median 2.25%

GPZ cheapest of 12 funds

XOVR 3rd cheapest of 12 funds

GPZ vs XOVR Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
GPZ No data
XOVR 0.00%
Payout (12M)
GPZ No data
XOVR None
Last payment
GPZ $0.22
XOVR No data
Ex-dividend
GPZ Dec 22, 2025
XOVR No data
Paid on
GPZ Dec 26, 2025
XOVR No data
Frequency
GPZ Irregular
XOVR No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

GPZIrregular · 1 paymentAll GPZ payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 22, 2025 $0.22. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$102017202020232026YTD
XOVR5 paymentsAll XOVR payments⁠
One bar per payment. 5 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 22, 2017 $0.01; Dec 18, 2018 $0.52; Dec 19, 2019 $0.01; Dec 21, 2020 $1.65; Dec 21, 2021 $8.73. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$102017202020232026YTD

GPZ vs XOVR Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
GPZ 27.5%since Jul 2025XOVR 24.2%since Sep 2024
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
GPZ −0.42since Jul 2025XOVR 0.43since Sep 2024
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
GPZ −31.7%since Jun 2025XOVR −25.2%since Aug 2024
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GPZ 0.85XOVR 1.20

GPZ and XOVR in the news

Popular comparisons

  • GPZBvsGTPEA

    VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF · Goldman Sachs MSCI World Private Equity Return Tracker ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.40% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XOVRBvsGTPEA

    ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF · Goldman Sachs MSCI World Private Equity Return Tracker ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.83% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GPZBvsBUYOB

    VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF · KraneShares Man Buyout Beta Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.40% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XOVRBvsBUYOB

    ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF · KraneShares Man Buyout Beta Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.83% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GPZBvsPSPC

    VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF · Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.40% · 1.75%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XOVRBvsPSPC

    ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF · Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.83% · 1.75%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.