TSMG ranks 1st and GRAG 123rd of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
GRAG vs TSMG
8.1%by weight
GRAG −0.01pt a year
0.75%0.76%
TSMG 1.4×the volume
48.8K69K
GRAG vs TSMG Performance
−62.1%+4.6%
- GRAG 0.75%, better
- TSMG 0.76%
- GRAG $3M
- TSMG $27M
- GRAG
- TSMG +9.2%
- GRAG 4
- TSMG 5
- GRAG 48.8K sh
- TSMG 69K sh, better
- GRAG $4.87
- TSMG $31.99
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GRAG | TSMG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A70 | A70 |
| Mission | B67 | A79Higher |
| Risk | C48 | A85Higher |
| Tradability | C46 | A75Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | C44 | B67Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. GRAG and TSMG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GRAGC
TSMGA
In short
GRAG Two times Grab Holdings' daily move, in an ETF you can hold in a plain brokerage account. It costs 0.75%, under the usual toll for single-stock leverage, and the exposure resets every day, which makes it a short-horizon instrument.
TSMG Two times TSM, one day at a time. TSMG aims for 200% of Taiwan Semiconductor's daily move, no margin account required, at 0.75% a year, below what most leveraged single-stock funds charge.
Stated mandate
GRAG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% (2x) of Grab Holdings Limited stock's daily performance before fees and expenses.
TSMG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% of the daily performance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd stock, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GRAG vs TSMG Holdings
How GRAG and TSMG differ
8.1%
Shared holdings make up 12.8% of TSMG and 8.1% of GRAG.
About this figure: GRAG gets much of its exposure from swaps and futures, which aren’t counted.
TSMG gets much of its exposure from swaps and futures, which aren’t counted.
Level by level
- Holdings8.1%
Sector
No Sector split for GRAG and TSMG.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in GRAGMore in TSMG | Gap | GRAG | TSMG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- GRAG208.1%
- TSMG212.8%
- GRAG1
- TSMG1
Asset class
- GRAG
- Stocks
- TSMG
- Stocks
Holdings
- Only in GRAG0
- In both1
- Only in TSMG0
Only in GRAG
0 securities, 0.0% of GRAG by weight
Only in TSMG
0 securities, 0.0% of TSMG by weight
Weight gaps
All 1 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.
| Holding | More in GRAGMore in TSMG | Gap | GRAG | TSMG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/2040 | TSMG +4.66 points | 8.12% | 12.78% |
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GRAG vs TSMG Cost
Overpaying TSMG vs GRAG
$174
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GRAG 0.75%
$14,482
TSMG 0.76%
$14,656
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GRAG | TSMG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,336 | $1,353 | $17 |
| 20 | $5,078 | $5,142 | $64 |
| 30 | $14,482 | $14,656 | $174 |
- 0.75%GRAG, cheaper
- 0.76%TSMG
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
GRAG 87th cheapest of 315 funds
TSMG 131st cheapest of 315 funds
GRAG vs TSMG Dividends
- GRAG None
- TSMG
- GRAG
- TSMG $2.73
- GRAG
- TSMG Dec 30, 2025
- GRAG
- TSMG Jan 2, 2026
- GRAG
- TSMG Irregular
Distribution history
GRAG vs TSMG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GRAG TSMG 77.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- GRAG TSMG 0.97
- Worst fall
- GRAG TSMG −63.7%
- Market sensitivity
- GRAG 1.40TSMG 3.98
Popular comparisons
- 0.75% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.78%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.78%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.