QIDX ranks 4th and GRW 14th of 16 funds in the US Active Quality Category.
GRW vs QIDX
QIDX −0.25pt a year
0.75%0.50%
GRW 1.3×the volume
5.16K3.94K
GRW vs QIDX Performance
−2.5%+8.7%
- GRW 0.75%
- QIDX 0.50%, better
- GRW $58M
- QIDX $39M
- GRW −2.5%
- QIDX +8.7%, better
- GRW 0.00%
- QIDX 0.91%, better
- GRW 31
- QIDX 130
- GRW 5.16K sh, better
- QIDX 3.94K sh
- GRW $31.05
- QIDX $11.55
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GRW | QIDX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D25 | A75Higher |
| Mission | B66 | |
| Risk | F13 | A76Higher |
| Tradability | D27Higher | F23 |
| Holdings | B56 | A93Higher |
| Durability | A73Higher | C45 |
Rank among US Active Quality funds
Same Category. GRW and QIDX are both graded against the same 16 US Active Quality funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GRWD
QIDXB
In short
GRW The name is the strategy: roughly 30 businesses TCW believes can keep compounding, picked actively and measured against the S&P 500. A stock-picker's book priced like one, not an index sleeve.
QIDX An active quality fund stitched from Indexperts' own house indexes: steady-earnings names across large, mid and small caps, with a manager free to override the rules. It charges less than the typical fund in its peer group.
Stated mandate
GRW The fund seeks long-term growth of capital through active management.
QIDX The Fund seeks total return.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GRW vs QIDX Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GRW vs QIDX Cost
Overpaying GRW vs QIDX
$4,503
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GRW 0.75%
$14,482
QIDX 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GRW | QIDX | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,336 | $900 | $436 |
| 20 | $5,078 | $3,460 | $1,618 |
| 30 | $14,482 | $9,979 | $4,503 |
- 0.75%GRW
- 0.50%QIDX, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Quality funds
- Median 0.65%
QIDX 4th cheapest of 16 funds
GRW 12th cheapest of 16 funds
GRW vs QIDX Dividends
- GRW 0.00%
- QIDX 0.91%, better
- GRW None
- QIDX $0.11
- GRW
- QIDX $0.03
- GRW
- QIDX Sep 29, 2026
- GRW
- QIDX Sep 30, 2026
- GRW
- QIDX Quarterly
Distribution history
GRW vs QIDX Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GRW 13.3%QIDX 9.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- GRW −0.13QIDX 0.25
- Worst fall
- GRW −23.8%QIDX −15.0%
- Market sensitivity
- GRW 0.98QIDX 0.57
Popular comparisons
- 0.75% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.