SDMF ranks 4th and GSG 17th of 21 funds in the Broad Commodity Futures Category.
GSG vs SDMF
0.0%by weight
SDMF −0.54pt a year
0.75%0.21%
GSG 46.4×the volume
1.18M25.4K
GSG vs SDMF Performance
+15.5%+4.8%
- GSG 0.75%
- SDMF 0.21%, better
- GSG $1.06B
- SDMF $49M
- GSG +59.5%
- SDMF
- GSG 25
- SDMF 27
- GSG 1.18M sh, better
- SDMF 25.4K sh
- GSG $37.24
- SDMF $27.08
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GSG | SDMF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D32 | A100Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | D30 | A72Higher |
| Tradability | B58Higher | D37 |
| Holdings | C46Higher | D25 |
| Durability | A83Higher | D30 |
Rank among Broad Commodity Futures funds
Same Category. GSG and SDMF are both graded against the same 21 Broad Commodity Futures funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GSGC
SDMFB
In short
GSG The old-guard commodity trade. Since 2006, GSG has tracked the S&P GSCI, a fully collateralized basket of commodity futures, while most of the newer competition is built on Bloomberg indexes and roll-tweaking overlays.
SDMF Managed futures without the hedge fund bill. SDMF tracks an index built to replicate what CTA trend funds are actually doing, using a short list of liquid futures markets, for 0.35% a year.
Stated mandate
GSG The fund seeks to track a fully collateralized index representing a diversified group of commodity futures.
SDMF The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GSG vs SDMF Holdings
How GSG and SDMF differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of GSG and 0.0% of SDMF.
Level by level
- Asset class0.0%
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for GSG.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
No country split for SDMF.
Concentration
- GSG61.2%
- SDMF299.9%
- GSG1
- SDMF24
Asset class
- GSG
- Commodities
- SDMF
- Alternatives
Holdings
- Only in GSG1
- In both0
- Only in SDMF24
Only in GSG
1 security, 96.5% of GSG by weight
- Treasury Bill96.54%
Only in SDMF
24 securities, 100% of SDMF by weight
- US Treasury Note, 2yr72.54%
- US Treasury Note62.40%
- Trs Dbmfc 080927 Bullet15.52%
- Trs Dbmfc 110827 Bullet15.39%
- Trs Dbmfnc 060427 Bullet15.34%
- Trs Dbmfnc 080927 Bullet13.48%
- Trs Dbmfnc 051427 Bullet10.84%
- Trs Dbmfc 112227 Bullet10.76%
- Trs Dbmfc 051427 Bullet10.69%
- Trs Dbmfnc 112227 Bullet10.34%
- Trs Dbmfnc 043027 Bullet8.69%
- Trs Dbmfc 043027 Bullet8.19%
- Trs Dbmfnc 092427 Bullet7.07%
- Trs Dbmfnc 070127 Bullet5.93%
- Trs Dbmfnc 060127 Bullet5.52%
- Trs Dbmfc 060127 Bullet5.18%
- Trs Dbmfc 070127 Bullet5.12%
- Trs Dbmfc 031527 Bullet4.28%
- Trs Dbmfc 060427 Bullet4.01%
- Trs Dbmfnc 110827 Bullet2.02%
- Trs Dbmfnc 102527 Bullet1.68%
- Trs Dbmfc 092427 Bullet1.01%
- Gold, 100 oz0.87%
- Trs Dbmfc 102527 Bullet0.23%
Weight gaps
GSG and SDMF share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GSG vs SDMF Cost
Overpaying GSG vs SDMF
$10,125
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GSG 0.75%
$14,482
SDMF 0.21%
$4,357
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GSG | SDMF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,336 | $383 | $953 |
| 20 | $5,078 | $1,491 | $3,587 |
| 30 | $14,482 | $4,357 | $10,125 |
- 0.75%GSG
- 0.21%SDMF, cheaper
- Middle half of Broad Commodity Futures funds
- Median 0.68%
SDMF cheapest of 21 funds
GSG 13th cheapest of 21 funds
GSG vs SDMF Dividends
- GSG None
- SDMF
- GSG
- SDMF $0.10
- GSG
- SDMF Sep 25, 2026
- GSG
- SDMF Sep 30, 2026
- GSG
- SDMF Quarterly
Distribution history
GSG vs SDMF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GSG 20.7%SDMF
- Return per unit of risk
- GSG 0.75SDMF
- Worst fall
- GSG −29.1%SDMF
- Market sensitivity
- GSG 1.27SDMF 0.27
GSG and SDMF in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.75% · 0.28%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.21% · 0.28%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.21% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.21% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.




