GSIB ranks 4th and QABA 7th of 9 funds in the Banks Category.
GSIB vs QABA
GSIB −0.25pt a year
0.35%0.60%
GSIB 1.6×the volume
13.6K8.73K
GSIB vs QABA Performance
+26.7%+27.3%
- GSIB 0.35%, better
- QABA 0.60%
- GSIB $39M
- QABA $86M
- GSIB +26.7%
- QABA +27.3%, better
- GSIB 1.67%
- QABA 2.32%, better
- GSIB 32
- QABA 160
- GSIB 13.6K sh, better
- QABA 8.73K sh
- GSIB $59.90
- QABA $66.47
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GSIB | QABA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B62Higher | F13 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A82Higher | B60 |
| Tradability | D28 | D34Higher |
| Holdings | B68 | A76Higher |
| Durability | D29 | C51Higher |
Rank among Banks funds
Same Category. GSIB and QABA are both graded against the same 9 Banks funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GSIBB
QABAD
In short
GSIB Most bank ETFs stop at the US border. GSIB goes after the other kind of bank: the world's systemically important ones, roughly 30 global megabanks in a single actively managed portfolio.
QABA The bank ETF that starts by deleting the biggest banks. QABA tracks a Nasdaq index of community banks and thrifts that drops the 50 largest by assets, plus credit-card and international specialists. Main Street lenders, not money centers.
Stated mandate
GSIB The Fund seeks growth of capital through an actively managed portfolio of equity securities issued by companies operating in the global banking sector.
QABA The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield of the Nasdaq OMX® ABA Community BankTM Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GSIB vs QABA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GSIB vs QABA Cost
Overpaying QABA vs GSIB
$4,691
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GSIB 0.35%
$7,126
QABA 0.60%
$11,817
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GSIB | QABA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $634 | $1,076 | $442 |
| 20 | $2,454 | $4,116 | $1,662 |
| 30 | $7,126 | $11,817 | $4,691 |
- 0.35%GSIB, cheaper
- 0.60%QABA
- Middle half of Banks funds
- Median 0.35%
GSIB 2nd cheapest of 9 funds
QABA 8th cheapest of 9 funds
GSIB vs QABA Dividends
- GSIB 1.67%
- QABA 2.32%, better
- GSIB $1.00
- QABA $1.54
- GSIB $1.00
- QABA $0.36
- GSIB Dec 18, 2025
- QABA Sep 24, 2026
- GSIB Dec 19, 2025
- QABA Sep 30, 2026
- GSIB Irregular
- QABA Quarterly
Distribution history
GSIB vs QABA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GSIB 13.4%QABA 22.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- GSIB 2.12QABA 0.83
- Worst fall
- GSIB −17.7%QABA −43.0%
- Market sensitivity
- GSIB 0.58QABA 0.98
Popular comparisons
- 0.35% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.