KRE ranks 1st and QABA 7th of 9 funds in the Banks Category.
KRE vs QABA
KRE −0.25pt a year
0.35%0.60%
KRE 1551.5×the volume
13.5M8.73K
KRE +0.6pt
+7.8%+7.2%
KRE vs QABA Performance
+16.5%+29.4%
- KRE 0.35%, better
- QABA 0.60%
- KRE $3.96B
- QABA $86M
- KRE +22.9%
- QABA +27.3%, better
- KRE 2.24%
- QABA 2.32%, better
- KRE 169
- QABA 160
- KRE 13.5M sh, better
- QABA 8.73K sh
- KRE $72.86
- QABA $66.47
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | KRE | QABA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B62Higher | F13 |
| Mission | D36 | |
| Risk | C41 | B60Higher |
| Tradability | A88Higher | D34 |
| Holdings | A85Higher | A76 |
| Durability | A80Higher | C51 |
Rank among Banks funds
Same Category. KRE and QABA are both graded against the same 9 Banks funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
KREB
QABAD
In short
KRE The regional-bank trade in one ticker. Since 2006 KRE has tracked a modified equal-weighted basket of US regional banks and thrifts, so a small-town lender can pull as much weight as a big multi-state one.
QABA The bank ETF that starts by deleting the biggest banks. QABA tracks a Nasdaq index of community banks and thrifts that drops the 50 largest by assets, plus credit-card and international specialists. Main Street lenders, not money centers.
Stated mandate
KRE The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of an index representing the regional banking segment of the U.S. banking industry.
QABA The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield of the Nasdaq OMX® ABA Community BankTM Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
KRE vs QABA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
KRE vs QABA Cost
Overpaying QABA vs KRE
$4,691
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
KRE 0.35%
$7,126
QABA 0.60%
$11,817
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | KRE | QABA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $634 | $1,076 | $442 |
| 20 | $2,454 | $4,116 | $1,662 |
| 30 | $7,126 | $11,817 | $4,691 |
- 0.35%KRE, cheaper
- 0.60%QABA
- Middle half of Banks funds
- Median 0.35%
KRE 2nd cheapest of 9 funds
QABA 8th cheapest of 9 funds
KRE vs QABA Dividends
- KRE 2.24%
- QABA 2.32%, better
- KRE $1.61
- QABA $1.54
- KRE $0.41
- QABA $0.36
- KRE Sep 21, 2026
- QABA Sep 24, 2026
- KRE Sep 23, 2026
- QABA Sep 30, 2026
- KRE Quarterly
- QABA Quarterly
Distribution history
KRE vs QABA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- KRE
- QABA
Risk facts
- Volatility
- KRE 24.2%QABA 22.9%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- KRE 0.87, betterQABA 0.83
- Worst fall
- KRE −52.7%QABA −43.0%, better
- Market sensitivity
- KRE 0.96QABA 0.98
KRE and QABA in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.35% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





