GSWO ranks 3rd and OEFA 27th of 30 funds in the International Multifactor Category.
GSWO vs OEFA
GSWO −0.33pt a year
0.15%0.48%
GSWO 33.5×the volume
64K1.91K
GSWO vs OEFA Performance
+0.5%+0.6%
- GSWO 0.15%, better
- OEFA 0.48%
- GSWO $1.79B
- OEFA $35M
- GSWO
- OEFA +9.6%
- GSWO 1.46%
- OEFA 1.60%, better
- GSWO 751
- OEFA 51
- GSWO 64K sh, better
- OEFA 1.91K sh
- GSWO $64.95
- OEFA $35.84
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GSWO | OEFA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A98Higher | F21 |
| Mission | A92 | |
| Risk | B67Higher | F24 |
| Tradability | A86Higher | C44 |
| Holdings | F22 | D25Higher |
| Durability | B62Higher | D30 |
Rank among International Multifactor funds
Same Category. GSWO and OEFA are both graded against the same 30 International Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GSWOA
OEFAD
In short
GSWO Four factor tilts (value, momentum, quality, low volatility) on developed markets outside the US, for 15 basis points. Goldman's ActiveBeta rules at a price closer to an index fund than an active one.
OEFA A tight, opinionated take on foreign dividends: roughly 50 developed-market large and mid caps that clear a quality screen first, income second. Running since 2015, and it sticks closely to the index on the label.
Stated mandate
GSWO The fund is an ActiveBeta World Equity ETF designed to track an ActiveBeta Index and provide exposure to value, momentum, quality, and low-volatility characteristics.
OEFA OEFA seeks to track the O'Shares International Developed Quality Dividend Index, providing access to high-quality, dividend-paying large- and mid-cap companies in developed ex-US markets.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GSWO vs OEFA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GSWO vs OEFA Cost
Overpaying OEFA vs GSWO
$6,468
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GSWO 0.15%
$3,137
OEFA 0.48%
$9,605
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GSWO | OEFA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $274 | $865 | $591 |
| 20 | $1,071 | $3,328 | $2,257 |
| 30 | $3,137 | $9,605 | $6,468 |
- 0.15%GSWO, cheaper
- 0.48%OEFA
- Middle half of International Multifactor funds
- Median 0.34%
GSWO cheapest of 30 funds
OEFA 24th cheapest of 30 funds
GSWO vs OEFA Dividends
- GSWO 1.46%
- OEFA 1.60%, better
- GSWO $0.93
- OEFA $0.57
- GSWO $0.20
- OEFA $0.08
- GSWO Sep 24, 2026
- OEFA Sep 17, 2026
- GSWO Sep 30, 2026
- OEFA Sep 22, 2026
- GSWO Quarterly
- OEFA Quarterly
Distribution history
GSWO vs OEFA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GSWO OEFA 13.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- GSWO OEFA 0.84
- Worst fall
- GSWO OEFA −32.5%
- Market sensitivity
- GSWO 0.75OEFA 0.94
Popular comparisons
- 0.15% · 0.16%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.48% · 0.16%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.48% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.48% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.