GSWO ranks 1st and QEFA 9th of 30 funds in the International Multifactor Category.
GSWO vs QEFA
GSWO −0.15pt a year
0.15%0.30%
GSWO 2.2×the volume
65.7K30.1K
GSWO vs QEFA Performance
−4.6%−0.1%
- GSWO 0.15%, better
- QEFA 0.30%
- GSWO $1.8B
- QEFA $1.05B
- GSWO
- QEFA +17.2%
- GSWO 1.50%
- QEFA 2.73%, better
- GSWO 723
- QEFA 637
- GSWO 65.7K sh, better
- QEFA 30.1K sh
- GSWO $64.69
- QEFA $101.28
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GSWO | QEFA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A98Higher | B59 |
| Mission | A98 | |
| Risk | A73Higher | B68 |
| Tradability | A86Higher | A74 |
| Holdings | D29 | B60Higher |
| Durability | B62 | A77Higher |
Rank among International Multifactor funds
Same Category. GSWO and QEFA are both graded against the same 30 International Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GSWOA
QEFAB
In short
GSWO Four factor tilts (value, momentum, quality, low volatility) on developed markets outside the US, for 15 basis points. Goldman's ActiveBeta rules at a price closer to an index fund than an active one.
QEFA One ticker, three factors. QEFA holds developed-market stocks outside the US through a single MSCI index that blends low volatility, quality and value, so you don't have to pick a lane or bolt three funds together.
Stated mandate
GSWO The fund is an ActiveBeta World Equity ETF designed to track an ActiveBeta Index and provide exposure to value, momentum, quality, and low-volatility characteristics.
QEFA The fund seeks to track the MSCI EAFE Factor Mix A-Series Index, using a Smart Beta strategy that combines low-volatility, quality, and value exposures.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GSWO vs QEFA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GSWO vs QEFA Cost
Overpaying QEFA vs GSWO
$3,012
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GSWO 0.15%
$3,137
QEFA 0.30%
$6,149
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GSWO | QEFA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $274 | $545 | $271 |
| 20 | $1,071 | $2,113 | $1,042 |
| 30 | $3,137 | $6,149 | $3,012 |
- 0.15%GSWO, cheaper
- 0.30%QEFA
- Middle half of International Multifactor funds
- Median 0.34%
GSWO cheapest of 30 funds
QEFA 12th cheapest of 30 funds
GSWO vs QEFA Dividends
- GSWO 1.50%
- QEFA 2.73%, better
- GSWO $0.93
- QEFA $2.74
- GSWO $0.20
- QEFA $1.50
- GSWO Sep 24, 2026
- QEFA Jun 1, 2026
- GSWO Sep 30, 2026
- QEFA Jun 5, 2026
- GSWO Quarterly
- QEFA Twice a year
Distribution history
GSWO vs QEFA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GSWO QEFA 11.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- GSWO QEFA 1.22
- Worst fall
- GSWO QEFA −27.3%
- Market sensitivity
- GSWO 0.75QEFA 0.80
Popular comparisons
- 0.15% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.16%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.16%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.