INTF ranks 2nd and QEFA 9th of 30 funds in the International Multifactor Category.
INTF vs QEFA
INTF −0.14pt a year
0.16%0.30%
INTF 10.3×the volume
312K30.1K
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
+9.4%+9.4%
INTF vs QEFA Performance
+61.9%+48.3%
- INTF 0.16%, better
- QEFA 0.30%
- INTF $3.77B
- QEFA $1.05B
- INTF +16.4%
- QEFA +17.2%, better
- INTF 3.04%, better
- QEFA 2.73%
- INTF 500
- QEFA 637
- INTF 312K sh, better
- QEFA 30.1K sh
- INTF $41.83
- QEFA $101.28
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | INTF | QEFA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A98Higher | B59 |
| Mission | A98 | |
| Risk | C51 | B68Higher |
| Tradability | A72 | A74Higher |
| Holdings | B68Higher | B60 |
| Durability | A86Higher | A77 |
Rank among International Multifactor funds
Same Category. INTF and QEFA are both graded against the same 30 International Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
INTFA
QEFAB
In short
INTF Five factors at once (value, quality, momentum, low volatility, low size) aimed at developed markets outside the US, for 0.16% a year. That is well under half what the typical international multifactor fund charges.
QEFA One ticker, three factors. QEFA holds developed-market stocks outside the US through a single MSCI index that blends low volatility, quality and value, so you don't have to pick a lane or bolt three funds together.
Stated mandate
INTF The fund seeks to track an index of international developed-market stocks chosen using value, quality, momentum, low-volatility, and low-size factors.
QEFA The fund seeks to track the MSCI EAFE Factor Mix A-Series Index, using a Smart Beta strategy that combines low-volatility, quality, and value exposures.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
INTF vs QEFA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
INTF vs QEFA Cost
Overpaying QEFA vs INTF
$2,807
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
INTF 0.16%
$3,342
QEFA 0.30%
$6,149
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | INTF | QEFA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $292 | $545 | $253 |
| 20 | $1,141 | $2,113 | $972 |
| 30 | $3,342 | $6,149 | $2,807 |
- 0.16%INTF, cheaper
- 0.30%QEFA
- Middle half of International Multifactor funds
- Median 0.34%
INTF 2nd cheapest of 30 funds
QEFA 12th cheapest of 30 funds
INTF vs QEFA Dividends
- INTF 3.04%, better
- QEFA 2.73%
- INTF $1.24
- QEFA $2.74
- INTF $0.72
- QEFA $1.50
- INTF Jun 15, 2026
- QEFA Jun 1, 2026
- INTF Jun 18, 2026
- QEFA Jun 5, 2026
- INTF Twice a year
- QEFA Twice a year
Distribution history
INTF vs QEFA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- INTF
- QEFA
Risk facts
- Volatility
- INTF 11.2%QEFA 11.0%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- INTF 1.45, betterQEFA 1.22
- Worst fall
- INTF −27.6%QEFA −27.3%, better
- Market sensitivity
- INTF 0.76QEFA 0.80
Popular comparisons
- 0.16% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.16% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.16% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.