Skip to content

GTOP vs TRUT

Goldman Sachs Technology Opportunities ETF

GTOPCNasdaq

VanEck Technology TruSector ETF

TRUTANasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

TRUT −0.51pt a year

GTOP0.65%TRUT0.14%

Avg volume · 30D

TRUT 15.5×the volume

GTOP11.7KTRUT182K

GTOP vs TRUT Performance

Dec 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+18.5%GTOP+18.1%TRUT

Dec 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. GTOP +18.5%. TRUT +18.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−10%0%30%Dec 2025Jun 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
GTOP 0.65%
TRUT 0.14%, better
Fund size
GTOP $709M
TRUT $238M
1Y total return
GTOP No data
TRUT +12.7%
Yield (12M)
GTOP No data
TRUT 0.35%
Holdings
GTOP 36
TRUT 77
Avg volume (30D)
GTOP 11.7K sh
TRUT 182K sh, better
NAV per share
GTOP $48.70
TRUT $31.15
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GTOP: Cost 43, Risk 40, Mission not scored, Tradability 41, Holdings 67, Durability 84. TRUT: Cost 93, Risk 23, Mission not scored, Tradability 96, Holdings 31, Durability 61.
Pillar letters and Scores for GTOP, TRUT, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGTOPTRUT
Cost30% weightC43A93Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC40HigherF23
Tradability15% weightC41A96Higher
Holdings10% weightB67HigherD31
Durability5% weightA84HigherB61

Rank among US Active Sector funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GTOP and TRUT are both graded against the same 35 US Active Sector funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Sector⁠

Category · 35 funds
See all 35 ›

TRUT ranks 4th and GTOP 19th of 35 funds in the US Active Sector Category.

  1. Rank 1AAVREAvantis Real Estate ETFScore 77
  2. Rank 2APSRInvesco Active U.S. Real Estate ETFScore 70
  3. Rank 2BTMEDT. Rowe Price Health Care ETFScore 70
  4. Rank 4ATRUTVanEck Technology TruSector ETFScore 69
  5. Rank 5BUTESVirtus Reaves Utilities ETFScore 66
  6. Rank 17CREITALPS Active REIT ETFScore 48
  7. Rank 19CGTOPGoldman Sachs Technology Opportunities ETFScore 47
  8. Rank 19CHAUSResidential REIT ETFScore 47

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GTOPCGoldman Sachs Technology Opportunities ETF

TRUTAVanEck Technology TruSector ETF

In short

GTOP A 1999-vintage tech stock picker wrapped in an ETF: at least 80% in technology names, free to roam from US mega caps to emerging markets, and measured against the Nasdaq Composite.

TRUT Diversification rules force most tech ETFs to trim their biggest names. TRUT's answer: own the giants directly up to the legal line, then top up with sector ETFs so the portfolio mirrors the sector's real shape.

Stated mandate

GTOP The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital. It invests at least 80% of its net assets in technology-company equity investments and generally targets companies expected to benefit from the proliferation of technology.

TRUT The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through active investment in securities of information technology-related companies or instruments providing exposure to them.

Why people hold it

  • GTOP Genuinely active. Managers hunt companies set to benefit from the spread of technology across US, international and emerging markets instead of tracking a fixed list.
  • The 0.65% fee sits right at the median for active US equity ETFs. You pay the going rate for stock picking, not a premium for it.
  • The strategy dates to 1999, so its record runs through the dot-com bust and every tech cycle since. Few tech mandates have that much road behind them.
  • Scored against the Nasdaq Composite Total Return Index, a demanding yardstick that makes the manager's contribution easy to judge.
  • TRUT The mechanism is the point. Fund rules cap one stock at 25% and stocks above 5% at 50% combined; TRUT fills the gap with targeted sector ETFs instead of overweighting smaller names.vaneck.comvaneck.com 2
  • 0.14% a year for an actively managed fund, against a median near 0.65% across active US equity peers. Cheap enough to sit alongside index products.
  • One of the two originals in VanEck's TruSector line, launched in 2025. The approach has since been extended across all 11 GICS sectors.vaneck.comvaneck.com 2
  • About 80 positions, quarterly distributions, and steady day-to-day trading. On cost and tradability it lands in the upper tier of its active US equity cohort.

Worth knowing

  • GTOP Thinly traded. Spreads can widen, so order type and timing matter more here than with the market's busiest funds.
  • One sector, concentrated book. A technology-only portfolio moves harder than a broad market fund, in both directions.
  • Broad active core rivals cost far less (DFAU 0.12%, AVLC 0.15%). The extra fee here buys concentrated tech research, not diversification.
  • TRUT Part of the exposure arrives through other ETFs rather than shares the fund holds outright. That is the workaround that makes uncapped weights possible, and it adds a layer.vaneck.com
  • Uncapped means concentrated. Leaning fully into tech's largest companies ties results to a handful of mega-caps more tightly than a capped sector fund would.vaneck.com
  • Launched August 2025, so there is only a short record of how closely the hybrid build actually shadows an uncapped tech benchmark.

Full GTOP profile⁠

Full TRUT profile⁠

GTOP vs TRUT Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GTOP vs TRUT Cost

Overpaying GTOP vs TRUT

$9,785

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GTOP 0.65%

    $12,717

  • TRUT 0.14%

    $2,932

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GTOP 0.65%
  • TRUT 0.14%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530GTOP $12,717TRUT $2,932

Year by year

YearGTOPTRUTOverpaying
10$1,163$256$907
20$4,440$1,000$3,440
30$12,717$2,932$9,785

Expense ratio

  • 0.65%GTOP
  • 0.14%TRUT, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Active Sector funds
  • Median 0.61%

TRUT 3rd cheapest of 35 funds

GTOP 19th cheapest of 35 funds

GTOP vs TRUT Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
GTOP No data
TRUT 0.35%
Payout (12M)
GTOP None
TRUT $0.11
Last payment
GTOP No data
TRUT $0.03
Ex-dividend
GTOP No data
TRUT Oct 1, 2026
Paid on
GTOP No data
TRUT Oct 6, 2026
Frequency
GTOP No data
TRUT Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

GTOPAll GTOP payments⁠

No distribution history available.

TRUTQuarterly · 5 paymentsAll TRUT payments⁠
One bar per payment. 5 payments from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Oct 1, 2025 $0.01; Dec 29, 2025 $0.02; Apr 1, 2026 $0.03; Jul 1, 2026 $0.03; Oct 1, 2026 $0.03. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.032026YTD

GTOP vs TRUT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
GTOP No dataTRUT 26.8%since Sep 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
GTOP No dataTRUT 0.78since Sep 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
GTOP No dataTRUT −18.6%since Aug 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GTOP 1.50TRUT 1.76

Popular comparisons

  • GTOPCvsAVREA

    Goldman Sachs Technology Opportunities ETF · Avantis Real Estate ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.17%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TRUTAvsAVREA

    VanEck Technology TruSector ETF · Avantis Real Estate ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.14% · 0.17%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GTOPCvsPSRA

    Goldman Sachs Technology Opportunities ETF · Invesco Active U.S. Real Estate ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TRUTAvsPSRA

    VanEck Technology TruSector ETF · Invesco Active U.S. Real Estate ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.14% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GTOPCvsTMEDB

    Goldman Sachs Technology Opportunities ETF · T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.44%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TRUTAvsTMEDB

    VanEck Technology TruSector ETF · T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.14% · 0.44%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.