SCYB ranks 1st and GTOQ 32nd of 84 funds in the US High Yield Category.
GTOQ vs SCYB
SCYB −0.36pt a year
0.39%0.03%
SCYB 32.9×the volume
33.6K1.1M
GTOQ vs SCYB Performance
−1.4%−1.3%
- GTOQ 0.39%
- SCYB 0.03%, better
- GTOQ $128M
- SCYB $2.8B
- GTOQ
- SCYB +2.0%
- GTOQ 7.14%
- SCYB 7.14%
- GTOQ 422
- SCYB 1844
- GTOQ 33.6K sh
- SCYB 1.1M sh, better
- GTOQ $21.45
- SCYB $25.22
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GTOQ | SCYB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B58 | A100Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | D34 | B59Higher |
| Tradability | C50 | A88Higher |
| Holdings | A73 | A99Higher |
| Durability | B63 | B68Higher |
Rank among US High Yield funds
Same Category. GTOQ and SCYB are both graded against the same 84 US High Yield funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GTOQB
SCYBA
In short
GTOQ A quant twist on junk bonds: GTOQ screens high-yield debt for value and low-volatility bonds instead of buying the index wholesale. Actively run, roughly 500 holdings, monthly payouts, at a fee near the middle of its category.
SCYB Three basis points for the broad US high-yield corporate market. Schwab undercuts a category where the typical fund charges more than ten times as much, spreading the bet across roughly 1,800 bonds and paying monthly.
Stated mandate
GTOQ The Fund seeks total return through active investment in high-yield, below-investment-grade fixed-income securities. Its systematic factor strategy targets quantifiable characteristics such as value and low volatility.
SCYB The fund follows a rules-based strategy intended to track the high-yield bond market, primarily through bonds in the Bloomberg Barclays US Corporate High Yield Total Return Index and similar derivatives.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GTOQ vs SCYB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GTOQ vs SCYB Cost
Overpaying GTOQ vs SCYB
$7,260
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GTOQ 0.39%
$7,898
SCYB 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GTOQ | SCYB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $705 | $55 | $650 |
| 20 | $2,725 | $216 | $2,509 |
| 30 | $7,898 | $638 | $7,260 |
- 0.39%GTOQ
- 0.03%SCYB, cheaper
- Middle half of US High Yield funds
- Median 0.42%
SCYB cheapest of 84 funds
GTOQ 31st cheapest of 84 funds
GTOQ vs SCYB Dividends
- GTOQ 7.14%
- SCYB 7.14%
- GTOQ $1.53
- SCYB $1.80
- GTOQ $0.13
- SCYB $0.16
- GTOQ Oct 19, 2026
- SCYB Oct 1, 2026
- GTOQ Oct 23, 2026
- SCYB Oct 7, 2026
- GTOQ Monthly
- SCYB Monthly
Distribution history
GTOQ vs SCYB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GTOQ SCYB 4.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- GTOQ SCYB 0.82
- Worst fall
- GTOQ SCYB −4.9%
- Market sensitivity
- GTOQ 0.64SCYB 0.28
GTOQ and SCYB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.39% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
