GXC ranks 4th and JCHI 10th of 28 funds in the China Category.
GXC vs JCHI
GXC −0.06pt a year
0.59%0.65%
GXC 18.2×the volume
23.4K1.29K
GXC +0.7pt
+8.4%+7.7%
GXC vs JCHI Performance
−19.1%−15.4%
- GXC 0.59%, better
- JCHI 0.65%
- GXC $421M
- JCHI $14M
- GXC −19.1%
- JCHI −15.4%, better
- GXC 2.46%, better
- JCHI 2.07%
- GXC 1539
- JCHI 56
- GXC 23.4K sh, better
- JCHI 1.29K sh
- GXC $80.17
- JCHI $47.90
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GXC | JCHI |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A78Higher | C53 |
| Mission | A85 | A89Higher |
| Risk | B67 | A75Higher |
| Tradability | B69Higher | F22 |
| Holdings | A76Higher | B57 |
| Durability | A84Higher | C49 |
Rank among China funds
Same Category. GXC and JCHI are both graded against the same 28 China funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GXCA
JCHIB
In short
GXC The whole China market in one ticker: roughly 1,400 stocks from megacaps down to small caps, tracked since 2007. Most China funds buy the famous names. GXC buys the phone book.
JCHI Most China ETFs just rent an index. JCHI picks instead: about 50 Chinese stocks chosen bottom up by J.P. Morgan's team, with MSCI China All Shares as the yardstick rather than the shopping list.
Stated mandate
GXC The fund seeks to provide returns that generally correspond to the total return performance of the S&P China BMI Index.
JCHI The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation by investing primarily in equity securities economically tied to China.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GXC vs JCHI Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GXC vs JCHI Cost
Overpaying JCHI vs GXC
$1,082
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GXC 0.59%
$11,635
JCHI 0.65%
$12,717
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GXC | JCHI | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,058 | $1,163 | $105 |
| 20 | $4,051 | $4,440 | $389 |
| 30 | $11,635 | $12,717 | $1,082 |
- 0.59%GXC, cheaper
- 0.65%JCHI
- Middle half of China funds
- Median 0.65%
GXC 5th cheapest of 28 funds
JCHI 11th cheapest of 28 funds
GXC vs JCHI Dividends
- GXC 2.46%, better
- JCHI 2.07%
- GXC $1.99
- JCHI $0.99
- GXC $0.67
- JCHI $0.99
- GXC Jun 22, 2026
- JCHI Dec 16, 2025
- GXC Jun 26, 2026
- JCHI Dec 18, 2025
- GXC Twice a year
- JCHI Annual
Distribution history
GXC vs JCHI Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GXC 20.7%JCHI 19.4%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- GXC 0.27, betterJCHI 0.24
- Worst fall
- GXC −46.5%JCHI −29.6%
- Market sensitivity
- GXC 0.69JCHI 0.64
Popular comparisons
- 0.59% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.