CXSE ranks 1st and GXC 4th of 28 funds in the China Category.
CXSE vs GXC
CXSE −0.27pt a year
0.32%0.59%
CXSE 1.6×the volume
37.2K23.4K
CXSE +0.5pt
+3.1%+2.6%
CXSE vs GXC Performance
−39.0%−18.2%
- CXSE 0.32%, better
- GXC 0.59%
- CXSE $372M
- GXC $421M
- CXSE −24.9%
- GXC −19.1%, better
- CXSE 2.22%
- GXC 2.46%, better
- CXSE 241
- GXC 1539
- CXSE 37.2K sh, better
- GXC 23.4K sh
- CXSE $31.37
- GXC $80.17
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CXSE | GXC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | A78 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A85 |
| Risk | C47 | B67Higher |
| Tradability | B63 | B69Higher |
| Holdings | A74 | A76Higher |
| Durability | A79 | A84Higher |
Rank among China funds
Same Category. CXSE and GXC are both graded against the same 28 China funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CXSEA
GXCA
In short
CXSE CXSE tracks an index that screens state-owned enterprises out of China, leaving the privately run companies. A tilt toward entrepreneurs rather than Beijing's balance sheet, at a fee well under the typical China fund.
GXC The whole China market in one ticker: roughly 1,400 stocks from megacaps down to small caps, tracked since 2007. Most China funds buy the famous names. GXC buys the phone book.
Stated mandate
CXSE The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Index.
GXC The fund seeks to provide returns that generally correspond to the total return performance of the S&P China BMI Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CXSE vs GXC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CXSE vs GXC Cost
Overpaying GXC vs CXSE
$5,093
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CXSE 0.32%
$6,542
GXC 0.59%
$11,635
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CXSE | GXC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $580 | $1,058 | $478 |
| 20 | $2,250 | $4,051 | $1,801 |
| 30 | $6,542 | $11,635 | $5,093 |
- 0.32%CXSE, cheaper
- 0.59%GXC
- Middle half of China funds
- Median 0.65%
CXSE 2nd cheapest of 28 funds
GXC 5th cheapest of 28 funds
CXSE vs GXC Dividends
- CXSE 2.22%
- GXC 2.46%, better
- CXSE $0.69
- GXC $1.99
- CXSE $0.26
- GXC $0.67
- CXSE Sep 25, 2026
- GXC Jun 22, 2026
- CXSE Sep 29, 2026
- GXC Jun 26, 2026
- CXSE Quarterly
- GXC Twice a year
Distribution history
CXSE vs GXC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- CXSE
- GXC
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CXSE 24.9%GXC 20.7%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- CXSE 0.12GXC 0.27, better
- Worst fall
- CXSE −57.6%GXC −46.5%, better
- Market sensitivity
- CXSE 0.75GXC 0.69
Popular comparisons
- 0.32% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.32% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.32% · 0.56%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.56%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.