ICOP ranks 4th and HAIL 5th of 18 funds in the Global Thematic Category.
HAIL vs ICOP
HAIL −0.02pt a year
0.45%0.47%
ICOP 38.4×the volume
2.54K97.5K
ICOP +23.4pt
+8.6%+32.0%
HAIL vs ICOP Performance
−13.4%+23.6%
- HAIL 0.45%, better
- ICOP 0.47%
- HAIL $16M
- ICOP $408M
- HAIL −13.4%
- ICOP +23.6%, better
- HAIL 2.17%, better
- ICOP 1.91%
- HAIL 88
- ICOP 78
- HAIL 2.54K sh
- ICOP 97.5K sh, better
- HAIL $32.15
- ICOP $46.95
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | HAIL | ICOP |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A83 | A83 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | D32 | C40Higher |
| Tradability | B58 | A81Higher |
| Holdings | A87Higher | C44 |
| Durability | B66 | A78Higher |
Rank among Global Thematic funds
Same Category. HAIL and ICOP are both graded against the same 18 Global Thematic funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
HAILB
ICOPB
In short
HAIL A 2017-vintage bet on how the world moves: self-driving and connected cars, drones, and the software that routes them. Kensho's machine-read index picks the names, at a fee below the typical global thematic fund.
ICOP The copper-miner aisle has a price leader. ICOP tracks a global index of copper and metals miners for 0.47% a year, the lowest sticker in its peer group, with BlackRock's indexing machinery behind it.
Stated mandate
HAIL The fund seeks to track the S&P Kensho Smart Transportation Index, which targets companies advancing smart transportation through autonomous and connected vehicles, drones, and advanced transportation tracking and optimization systems.
ICOP The Fund seeks to track an index of U.S. and non-U.S. equities of companies primarily engaged in copper and metal ore mining.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
HAIL vs ICOP Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
HAIL vs ICOP Cost
Overpaying ICOP vs HAIL
$377
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
HAIL 0.45%
$9,041
ICOP 0.47%
$9,418
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | HAIL | ICOP | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $812 | $847 | $35 |
| 20 | $3,128 | $3,261 | $133 |
| 30 | $9,041 | $9,418 | $377 |
- 0.45%HAIL, cheaper
- 0.47%ICOP
- Middle half of Global Thematic funds
- Median 0.58%
HAIL 3rd cheapest of 18 funds
ICOP 5th cheapest of 18 funds
HAIL vs ICOP Dividends
- HAIL 2.17%, better
- ICOP 1.91%
- HAIL $0.68
- ICOP $0.89
- HAIL $0.09
- ICOP $0.27
- HAIL Sep 21, 2026
- ICOP Jun 15, 2026
- HAIL Sep 23, 2026
- ICOP Jun 18, 2026
- HAIL Quarterly
- ICOP Twice a year
Distribution history
HAIL vs ICOP Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- HAIL 25.8%, betterICOP 30.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- HAIL 0.27ICOP 0.93, better
- Worst fall
- HAIL −63.0%ICOP −38.6%
- Market sensitivity
- HAIL 1.85ICOP 1.34
HAIL and ICOP in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.45% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
