WRND ranks 3rd and ICOP 4th of 18 funds in the Global Thematic Category.
ICOP vs WRND
WRND −0.29pt a year
0.47%0.18%
ICOP 183.3×the volume
97.5K532
ICOP +9.4pt
+32.0%+22.6%
ICOP vs WRND Performance
+23.6%+9.3%
- ICOP 0.47%
- WRND 0.18%, better
- ICOP $408M
- WRND $11M
- ICOP +23.6%, better
- WRND +9.3%
- ICOP 1.91%, better
- WRND 0.97%
- ICOP 78
- WRND 208
- ICOP 97.5K sh, better
- WRND 532 sh
- ICOP $46.95
- WRND $40.74
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ICOP | WRND |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A83 | A100Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C40 | A76Higher |
| Tradability | A81Higher | F15 |
| Holdings | C44 | B58Higher |
| Durability | A78Higher | C47 |
Rank among Global Thematic funds
Same Category. ICOP and WRND are both graded against the same 18 Global Thematic funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ICOPB
WRNDB
In short
ICOP The copper-miner aisle has a price leader. ICOP tracks a global index of copper and metals miners for 0.47% a year, the lowest sticker in its peer group, with BlackRock's indexing machinery behind it.
WRND Most innovation funds sell you a story. WRND buys receipts: roughly 200 companies worldwide picked on what they actually spend on R&D and whether that spending earns a return, at a fee well under the thematic norm.
Stated mandate
ICOP The Fund seeks to track an index of U.S. and non-U.S. equities of companies primarily engaged in copper and metal ore mining.
WRND The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the IQ Global Equity R&D Leaders Index. Its passive strategy targets innovative companies worldwide based on high research and development spending.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ICOP vs WRND Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ICOP vs WRND Cost
Overpaying ICOP vs WRND
$5,669
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ICOP 0.47%
$9,418
WRND 0.18%
$3,749
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ICOP | WRND | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $847 | $328 | $519 |
| 20 | $3,261 | $1,281 | $1,980 |
| 30 | $9,418 | $3,749 | $5,669 |
- 0.47%ICOP
- 0.18%WRND, cheaper
- Middle half of Global Thematic funds
- Median 0.58%
WRND cheapest of 18 funds
ICOP 5th cheapest of 18 funds
ICOP vs WRND Dividends
- ICOP 1.91%, better
- WRND 0.97%
- ICOP $0.89
- WRND $0.40
- ICOP $0.27
- WRND $0.10
- ICOP Jun 15, 2026
- WRND Sep 30, 2026
- ICOP Jun 18, 2026
- WRND Oct 2, 2026
- ICOP Twice a year
- WRND Quarterly
Distribution history
ICOP vs WRND Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ICOP 30.3%WRND 14.5%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- ICOP 0.93WRND 1.18, better
- Worst fall
- ICOP −38.6%WRND −27.2%
- Market sensitivity
- ICOP 1.34WRND 1.15
Popular comparisons
- 0.47% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.