Skip to content

ICOP vs WRND

iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF

ICOPBNasdaq

NYLI Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF

WRNDBNasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

WRND −0.29pt a year

ICOP0.47%WRND0.18%

Avg volume · 30D

ICOP 183.3×the volume

ICOP97.5KWRND532

3Y return · a year

ICOP +9.4pt

ICOP+32.0%WRND+22.6%

ICOP vs WRND Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+23.6%ICOP+9.3%WRND

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. ICOP +23.6%. WRND +9.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%40%60%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
ICOP 0.47%
WRND 0.18%, better
Fund size
ICOP $408M
WRND $11M
1Y total return
ICOP +23.6%, better
WRND +9.3%
Yield (12M)
ICOP 1.91%, better
WRND 0.97%
Holdings
ICOP 78
WRND 208
Avg volume (30D)
ICOP 97.5K sh, better
WRND 532 sh
NAV per share
ICOP $46.95
WRND $40.74
52W range

ETF.net Grade

ICOP: Cost 83, Risk 40, Mission not scored, Tradability 81, Holdings 44, Durability 78. WRND: Cost 100, Risk 76, Mission not scored, Tradability 15, Holdings 58, Durability 47.
Pillar letters and Scores for ICOP, WRND, with each pillar’s weight
PillarICOPWRND
Cost30% weightA83A100Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC40A76Higher
Tradability15% weightA81HigherF15
Holdings10% weightC44B58Higher
Durability5% weightA78HigherC47

Rank among Global Thematic funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. ICOP and WRND are both graded against the same 18 Global Thematic funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Global Thematic⁠

Category · 18 funds
See all 18 ›

WRND ranks 3rd and ICOP 4th of 18 funds in the Global Thematic Category.

  1. Rank 1AFITEState Street SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETFScore 79
  2. Rank 2AAGNGGlobal X Aging Population ETFScore 70
  3. Rank 3BWRNDNYLI Global Equity R&D Leaders ETFScore 69
  4. Rank 4BICOPiShares Copper and Metals Mining ETFScore 68
  5. Rank 5BHAILState Street SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETFScore 67

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

ICOPBiShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF

WRNDBNYLI Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF

In short

ICOP The copper-miner aisle has a price leader. ICOP tracks a global index of copper and metals miners for 0.47% a year, the lowest sticker in its peer group, with BlackRock's indexing machinery behind it.

WRND Most innovation funds sell you a story. WRND buys receipts: roughly 200 companies worldwide picked on what they actually spend on R&D and whether that spending earns a return, at a fee well under the thematic norm.

Stated mandate

ICOP The Fund seeks to track an index of U.S. and non-U.S. equities of companies primarily engaged in copper and metal ore mining.

WRND The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the IQ Global Equity R&D Leaders Index. Its passive strategy targets innovative companies worldwide based on high research and development spending.

Why people hold it

  • ICOP At 0.47% a year it is the cheapest fund in the copper-mining cohort, undercutting COPX (0.65%), COPP (0.66%), COPJ (0.75%) and KCOP (0.99%), and sitting below the group's 0.66% median.
  • A rules-based pure play: it follows the STOXX Global Copper and Metals Mining Index, holding companies primarily engaged in copper and metal ore mining. Miners' shares, not copper futures, and no stock-picking.ishares.com
  • Global by mandate, not by accident: the index reaches U.S. and non-U.S. miners, which is where much of the world's copper actually trades. Distributions are paid quarterly.ishares.com
  • One of the stronger builds in a small copper-mining field, pairing the lowest fee in the group with a mainstream iShares index wrapper.
  • WRND 0.18% a year against a 0.56% median for its global thematic peers. Innovation exposure without the boutique markup.newyorklifeinvestments.com
  • Selection leans on the income statement: R&D intensity paired with return on invested capital, favoring firms that turn research budgets into results.newyorklifeinvestments.com
  • Roughly 200 names from a global universe, one of three R&D-screened funds New York Life launched in 2022 rather than a one-off experiment.businesswire.com

Worth knowing

  • ICOP Non-diversified by design: a few dozen miners levered to one metal, with the largest names carrying a big slice. Copper prices and mine-level news drive the ride.ishares.com
  • A large share of the basket is listed outside the U.S., so currency moves and foreign market risks come along with the copper exposure.ishares.com
  • It launched in 2023, so the live record is short, and trading is moderate rather than heavy. Limit orders earn their keep on bigger tickets.
  • WRND Small and lightly traded, so bid/ask spreads tend to run wider than on mainstream global index funds.
  • Weighting by R&D dollars, with a cap on any single position, tilts the book toward the world's largest research spenders.businesswire.cometfstrategy.com
  • Distributions arrive quarterly, but income isn't the mandate; the index screens on research spending, not payouts.

Full ICOP profile⁠

Full WRND profile⁠

ICOP vs WRND Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ICOP vs WRND Cost

Overpaying ICOP vs WRND

$5,669

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • ICOP 0.47%

    $9,418

  • WRND 0.18%

    $3,749

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • ICOP 0.47%
  • WRND 0.18%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530ICOP $9,418WRND $3,749

Year by year

YearICOPWRNDOverpaying
10$847$328$519
20$3,261$1,281$1,980
30$9,418$3,749$5,669

Expense ratio

  • 0.47%ICOP
  • 0.18%WRND, cheaper
  • Middle half of Global Thematic funds
  • Median 0.58%

WRND cheapest of 18 funds

ICOP 5th cheapest of 18 funds

ICOP vs WRND Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
ICOP 1.91%, better
WRND 0.97%
Payout (12M)
ICOP $0.89
WRND $0.40
Last payment
ICOP $0.27
WRND $0.10
Ex-dividend
ICOP Jun 15, 2026
WRND Sep 30, 2026
Paid on
ICOP Jun 18, 2026
WRND Oct 2, 2026
Frequency
ICOP Twice a year
WRND Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2022 to 2026, same scale for both

ICOPTwice a year · 7 paymentsAll ICOP payments⁠
One bar per payment. 7 payments from 2022 to 2026 YTD. Dec 20, 2023 $0.55; Jun 11, 2024 $0.05; Dec 17, 2024 $0.42; Jun 16, 2025 $0.30; Dec 16, 2025 $0.59; Dec 30, 2025 $0.03; Jun 15, 2026 $0.27. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD
WRNDQuarterly · 18 paymentsAll WRND payments⁠
One bar per payment. 18 payments from 2022 to 2026 YTD. Mar 18, 2022 $0.06; Jun 17, 2022 $0.17; Sep 16, 2022 $0.08; Dec 16, 2022 $0.11; Mar 31, 2023 $0.11; Jun 30, 2023 $0.08; Sep 29, 2023 $0.15; Dec 15, 2023 $0.21; Jun 28, 2024 $0.16; Sep 30, 2024 $0.11; Dec 30, 2024 $0.06; Mar 31, 2025 $0.11; Jun 30, 2025 $0.18; Sep 30, 2025 $0.09; Dec 30, 2025 $0.11; Mar 31, 2026 $0.05; Jun 30, 2026 $0.14; Sep 30, 2026 $0.10. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD

ICOP vs WRND Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
ICOP 30.3%WRND 14.5%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
ICOP 0.93WRND 1.18, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
ICOP −38.6%since Jun 2023WRND −27.2%since Feb 2022
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
ICOP 1.34WRND 1.15

Popular comparisons

  • ICOPBvsFITEA

    iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.47% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • WRNDBvsFITEA

    NYLI Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ICOPBvsAGNGA

    iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF · Global X Aging Population ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.47% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • WRNDBvsAGNGA

    NYLI Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF · Global X Aging Population ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ICOPBvsHAILB

    iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.47% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • WRNDBvsHAILB

    NYLI Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.