AGNG ranks 2nd and ICOP 4th of 18 funds in the Global Thematic Category.
AGNG vs ICOP
ICOP −0.03pt a year
0.50%0.47%
ICOP 9.3×the volume
10.4K97.5K
ICOP +14.3pt
+17.7%+32.0%
AGNG vs ICOP Performance
+18.0%+23.6%
- AGNG 0.50%
- ICOP 0.47%, better
- AGNG $96M
- ICOP $408M
- AGNG +18.0%
- ICOP +23.6%, better
- AGNG 0.83%
- ICOP 1.91%, better
- AGNG 87
- ICOP 78
- AGNG 10.4K sh
- ICOP 97.5K sh, better
- AGNG $39.56
- ICOP $46.95
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AGNG | ICOP |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B67 | A83Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A80Higher | C40 |
| Tradability | B63 | A81Higher |
| Holdings | A76Higher | C44 |
| Durability | A74 | A78Higher |
Rank among Global Thematic funds
Same Category. AGNG and ICOP are both graded against the same 18 Global Thematic funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AGNGA
ICOPB
In short
AGNG AGNG plays the one trend nobody needs a crystal ball for: people getting older. About 80 developed-market names in medical devices, pharma and senior living, wrapped around an aging-population index, for 0.50% a year.
ICOP The copper-miner aisle has a price leader. ICOP tracks a global index of copper and metals miners for 0.47% a year, the lowest sticker in its peer group, with BlackRock's indexing machinery behind it.
Stated mandate
AGNG The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Indxx Aging Population Thematic Index.
ICOP The Fund seeks to track an index of U.S. and non-U.S. equities of companies primarily engaged in copper and metal ore mining.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AGNG vs ICOP Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AGNG vs ICOP Cost
Overpaying AGNG vs ICOP
$561
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AGNG 0.50%
$9,979
ICOP 0.47%
$9,418
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AGNG | ICOP | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $847 | $53 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $3,261 | $199 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $9,418 | $561 |
- 0.50%AGNG
- 0.47%ICOP, cheaper
- Middle half of Global Thematic funds
- Median 0.58%
ICOP 5th cheapest of 18 funds
AGNG 7th cheapest of 18 funds
AGNG vs ICOP Dividends
- AGNG 0.83%
- ICOP 1.91%, better
- AGNG $0.33
- ICOP $0.89
- AGNG $0.16
- ICOP $0.27
- AGNG Jun 29, 2026
- ICOP Jun 15, 2026
- AGNG Jul 7, 2026
- ICOP Jun 18, 2026
- AGNG Twice a year
- ICOP Twice a year
Distribution history
AGNG vs ICOP Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AGNG 13.1%, betterICOP 30.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- AGNG 0.98, betterICOP 0.93
- Worst fall
- AGNG −23.9%ICOP −38.6%
- Market sensitivity
- AGNG 0.60ICOP 1.34
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.