Skip to content

AGNG vs ICOP

Global X Aging Population ETF

AGNGANasdaq

iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF

ICOPBNasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

ICOP −0.03pt a year

AGNG0.50%ICOP0.47%

Avg volume · 30D

ICOP 9.3×the volume

AGNG10.4KICOP97.5K

3Y return · a year

ICOP +14.3pt

AGNG+17.7%ICOP+32.0%

AGNG vs ICOP Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+18.0%AGNG+23.6%ICOP

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. AGNG +18.0%. ICOP +23.6%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%40%50%60%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
AGNG 0.50%
ICOP 0.47%, better
Fund size
AGNG $96M
ICOP $408M
1Y total return
AGNG +18.0%
ICOP +23.6%, better
Yield (12M)
AGNG 0.83%
ICOP 1.91%, better
Holdings
AGNG 87
ICOP 78
Avg volume (30D)
AGNG 10.4K sh
ICOP 97.5K sh, better
NAV per share
AGNG $39.56
ICOP $46.95
52W range

ETF.net Grade

AGNG: Cost 67, Risk 80, Mission not scored, Tradability 63, Holdings 76, Durability 74. ICOP: Cost 83, Risk 40, Mission not scored, Tradability 81, Holdings 44, Durability 78.
Pillar letters and Scores for AGNG, ICOP, with each pillar’s weight
PillarAGNGICOP
Cost30% weightB67A83Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA80HigherC40
Tradability15% weightB63A81Higher
Holdings10% weightA76HigherC44
Durability5% weightA74A78Higher

Rank among Global Thematic funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. AGNG and ICOP are both graded against the same 18 Global Thematic funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Global Thematic⁠

Category · 18 funds
See all 18 ›

AGNG ranks 2nd and ICOP 4th of 18 funds in the Global Thematic Category.

  1. Rank 1AFITEState Street SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETFScore 79
  2. Rank 2AAGNGGlobal X Aging Population ETFScore 70
  3. Rank 3BWRNDNYLI Global Equity R&D Leaders ETFScore 69
  4. Rank 4BICOPiShares Copper and Metals Mining ETFScore 68
  5. Rank 5BHAILState Street SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETFScore 67

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

AGNGAGlobal X Aging Population ETF

ICOPBiShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF

In short

AGNG AGNG plays the one trend nobody needs a crystal ball for: people getting older. About 80 developed-market names in medical devices, pharma and senior living, wrapped around an aging-population index, for 0.50% a year.

ICOP The copper-miner aisle has a price leader. ICOP tracks a global index of copper and metals miners for 0.47% a year, the lowest sticker in its peer group, with BlackRock's indexing machinery behind it.

Stated mandate

AGNG The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Indxx Aging Population Thematic Index.

ICOP The Fund seeks to track an index of U.S. and non-U.S. equities of companies primarily engaged in copper and metal ore mining.

Why people hold it

  • AGNG One ticket on the demographics trade: roughly 80 developed-market companies tied to older consumers, tracking the Indxx Aging Population Thematic Index.globalxetfs.com
  • 0.50% a year, below the median fee in its global thematic peer group. Niche themes usually charge a premium for the privilege.
  • Running since 2016, so the theme has a long live record rather than a backtest and a pitch deck.
  • Portfolio construction and risk profile put it among the stronger builds in its global thematic peer group.
  • ICOP At 0.47% a year it is the cheapest fund in the copper-mining cohort, undercutting COPX (0.65%), COPP (0.66%), COPJ (0.75%) and KCOP (0.99%), and sitting below the group's 0.66% median.
  • A rules-based pure play: it follows the STOXX Global Copper and Metals Mining Index, holding companies primarily engaged in copper and metal ore mining. Miners' shares, not copper futures, and no stock-picking.ishares.com
  • Global by mandate, not by accident: the index reaches U.S. and non-U.S. miners, which is where much of the world's copper actually trades. Distributions are paid quarterly.ishares.com
  • One of the stronger builds in a small copper-mining field, pairing the lowest fee in the group with a mainstream iShares index wrapper.

Worth knowing

  • AGNG Thinly traded, so spreads can run wider than in mega-cap funds and how you place the order matters more.
  • One theme, tilted to healthcare and developed markets, so its path can look nothing like a broad global index.
  • Distributions arrive annually or semiannually, not monthly, and the asset base is modest by ETF standards.
  • ICOP Non-diversified by design: a few dozen miners levered to one metal, with the largest names carrying a big slice. Copper prices and mine-level news drive the ride.ishares.com
  • A large share of the basket is listed outside the U.S., so currency moves and foreign market risks come along with the copper exposure.ishares.com
  • It launched in 2023, so the live record is short, and trading is moderate rather than heavy. Limit orders earn their keep on bigger tickets.

Full AGNG profile⁠

Full ICOP profile⁠

AGNG vs ICOP Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

AGNG vs ICOP Cost

Overpaying AGNG vs ICOP

$561

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • AGNG 0.50%

    $9,979

  • ICOP 0.47%

    $9,418

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • AGNG 0.50%
  • ICOP 0.47%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530AGNG $9,979ICOP $9,418

Year by year

YearAGNGICOPOverpaying
10$900$847$53
20$3,460$3,261$199
30$9,979$9,418$561

Expense ratio

  • 0.50%AGNG
  • 0.47%ICOP, cheaper
  • Middle half of Global Thematic funds
  • Median 0.58%

ICOP 5th cheapest of 18 funds

AGNG 7th cheapest of 18 funds

AGNG vs ICOP Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
AGNG 0.83%
ICOP 1.91%, better
Payout (12M)
AGNG $0.33
ICOP $0.89
Last payment
AGNG $0.16
ICOP $0.27
Ex-dividend
AGNG Jun 29, 2026
ICOP Jun 15, 2026
Paid on
AGNG Jul 7, 2026
ICOP Jun 18, 2026
Frequency
AGNG Twice a year
ICOP Twice a year

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

AGNGTwice a year · 17 paymentsAll AGNG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 17 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 28, 2017 $0.20; Dec 28, 2018 $0.19; Jun 27, 2019 $0.05; Dec 30, 2019 $0.14; Jun 29, 2020 $0.04; Dec 30, 2020 $0.05; Jun 29, 2021 $0.03; Dec 30, 2021 $0.17; Jun 29, 2022 $0.11; Dec 29, 2022 $0.02; Jun 29, 2023 $0.15; Dec 28, 2023 $0.12; Jun 27, 2024 $0.10; Dec 30, 2024 $0.15; Jun 27, 2025 $0.14; Dec 30, 2025 $0.17; Jun 29, 2026 $0.16. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD
ICOPTwice a year · 7 paymentsAll ICOP payments⁠
One bar per payment. 7 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 20, 2023 $0.55; Jun 11, 2024 $0.05; Dec 17, 2024 $0.42; Jun 16, 2025 $0.30; Dec 16, 2025 $0.59; Dec 30, 2025 $0.03; Jun 15, 2026 $0.27. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD

AGNG vs ICOP Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
AGNG 13.1%, betterICOP 30.3%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
AGNG 0.98, betterICOP 0.93
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
AGNG −23.9%ICOP −38.6%since Jun 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
AGNG 0.60ICOP 1.34

Popular comparisons

  • AGNGAvsFITEA

    Global X Aging Population ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ICOPBvsFITEA

    iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.47% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • AGNGAvsWRNDB

    Global X Aging Population ETF · NYLI Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ICOPBvsWRNDB

    iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF · NYLI Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.47% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • AGNGAvsHAILB

    Global X Aging Population ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ICOPBvsHAILB

    iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.47% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.