HBDC ranks 1st and HFGM 18th of 29 funds in the Alternative Strategies Category.
HBDC vs HFGM
HBDC −0.62pt a year
0.39%1.01%
HFGM 5.1×the volume
8.86K44.9K
HBDC vs HFGM Performance
+2.9%+1.4%
- HBDC 0.39%, better
- HFGM 1.01%
- HBDC $91M
- HFGM $135M
- HBDC +2.9%, better
- HFGM +1.4%
- HBDC 5.11%
- HFGM
- HBDC 156
- HFGM 23
- HBDC 8.86K sh
- HFGM 44.9K sh, better
- HBDC $24.50
- HFGM $28.21
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | HBDC | HFGM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | B60 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B67Higher | F14 |
| Tradability | C50 | C50 |
| Holdings | A86 | |
| Durability | C49 | C52Higher |
Rank among Alternative Strategies funds
Same Category. HBDC and HFGM are both graded against the same 29 Alternative Strategies funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
HBDCA
HFGMC
In short
HBDC Private credit's lenders have to borrow too. HBDC owns the senior unsecured bonds that business development companies issue, a first-mover take on BDC debt instead of BDC stock, wrapped in a rules-based index.
HFGM Most macro funds pick their own trades. HFGM reverse-engineers what global macro hedge funds are already positioned in, then runs that book at roughly twice the sector's volatility. Replication, with the dial turned up.
Stated mandate
HBDC The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the Solactive Hilton Capital BDC Corporate Bond TR Index.
HFGM The Fund seeks capital appreciation by using a proprietary algorithm to build long and short positions in broad-based ETFs and futures, seeking to match recent gross returns of hedge funds’ Global Macro sector while targeting approximately twice its volatility.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
HBDC vs HFGM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
HBDC vs HFGM Cost
Overpaying HFGM vs HBDC
$10,952
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
HBDC 0.39%
$7,898
HFGM 1.01%
$18,850
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | HBDC | HFGM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $705 | $1,780 | $1,075 |
| 20 | $2,725 | $6,686 | $3,961 |
| 30 | $7,898 | $18,850 | $10,952 |
- 0.39%HBDC, cheaper
- 1.01%HFGM
- Middle half of Alternative Strategies funds
- Median 1.13%
HBDC cheapest of 29 funds
HFGM 12th cheapest of 29 funds
HBDC vs HFGM Dividends
- HBDC 5.11%
- HFGM
- HBDC $1.25
- HFGM
- HBDC $0.11
- HFGM $3.24
- HBDC Oct 29, 2026
- HFGM Dec 24, 2025
- HBDC Oct 30, 2026
- HFGM Dec 26, 2025
- HBDC Monthly
- HFGM Irregular
Distribution history
HBDC vs HFGM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- HBDC 2.5%HFGM 16.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- HBDC −0.27HFGM 0.88
- Worst fall
- HBDC −3.0%HFGM −21.2%
- Market sensitivity
- HBDC 0.13HFGM 0.72
HBDC and HFGM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.39% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.01% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.81%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.01% · 0.81%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.01% · 0.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

