HBDC ranks 2nd and MKTN 18th of 29 funds in the Alternative Strategies Category.
HBDC vs MKTN
HBDC −1.55pt a year
0.39%1.94%
MKTN 4.8×the volume
7.84K37.6K
HBDC vs MKTN Performance
+2.0%+13.3%
- HBDC 0.39%, better
- MKTN 1.94%
- HBDC $90M
- MKTN $160M
- HBDC +2.0%
- MKTN +13.3%, better
- HBDC 5.15%
- MKTN
- HBDC 156
- MKTN 223
- HBDC 7.84K sh
- MKTN 37.6K sh, better
- HBDC $24.37
- MKTN $28.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | HBDC | MKTN |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | F21 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B63 | A80Higher |
| Tradability | C48 | B67Higher |
| Holdings | A86 | |
| Durability | C49Higher | C46 |
Rank among Alternative Strategies funds
Same Category. HBDC and MKTN are both graded against the same 29 Alternative Strategies funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
HBDCA
MKTNC
In short
HBDC Private credit's lenders have to borrow too. HBDC owns the senior unsecured bonds that business development companies issue, a first-mover take on BDC debt instead of BDC stock, wrapped in a rules-based index.
MKTN A real long/short stock book in an ETF: Federated Hermes' MDT quants buy one basket of US stocks and short another, aiming for gains that lean less on market direction. Costs 1.94% net of a waiver through March 1, 2027.
Stated mandate
HBDC The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the Solactive Hilton Capital BDC Corporate Bond TR Index.
MKTN The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation while limiting exposure to general stock-market risk through a quantitative, market-neutral strategy that selects long and short publicly traded common stocks.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
HBDC vs MKTN Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
HBDC vs MKTN Cost
Overpaying MKTN vs HBDC
$24,258
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
HBDC 0.39%
$7,898
MKTN 1.94%
$32,156
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | HBDC | MKTN | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $705 | $3,289 | $2,584 |
| 20 | $2,725 | $11,859 | $9,134 |
| 30 | $7,898 | $32,156 | $24,258 |
- 0.39%HBDC, cheaper
- 1.94%MKTN
- Middle half of Alternative Strategies funds
- Median 1.13%
HBDC cheapest of 29 funds
MKTN 23rd cheapest of 29 funds
HBDC vs MKTN Dividends
- HBDC 5.15%
- MKTN
- HBDC $1.25
- MKTN
- HBDC $0.11
- MKTN $0.07
- HBDC Oct 29, 2026
- MKTN Dec 31, 2025
- HBDC Oct 30, 2026
- MKTN Jan 2, 2026
- HBDC Monthly
- MKTN Irregular
Distribution history
HBDC vs MKTN Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- HBDC 2.5%MKTN 5.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- HBDC −0.28MKTN 1.52
- Worst fall
- HBDC −3.0%MKTN −4.1%
- Market sensitivity
- HBDC 0.13MKTN −0.16
HBDC and MKTN in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.39% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.94% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.81%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.94% · 0.81%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.94% · 0.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
