QALT ranks 4th and MKTN 18th of 29 funds in the Alternative Strategies Category.
MKTN vs QALT
QALT −1.14pt a year
1.94%0.80%
MKTN 2.1×the volume
37.6K17.7K
MKTN vs QALT Performance
+13.3%+6.6%
- MKTN 1.94%
- QALT 0.80%, better
- MKTN $160M
- QALT $195M
- MKTN +13.3%, better
- QALT +6.6%
- MKTN 223
- QALT 26
- MKTN 37.6K sh, better
- QALT 17.7K sh
- MKTN $28.31
- QALT $25.87
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | MKTN | QALT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F21 | A90Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A80Higher | B65 |
| Tradability | B67Higher | B57 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | C46 | B65Higher |
Rank among Alternative Strategies funds
Same Category. MKTN and QALT are both graded against the same 29 Alternative Strategies funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
MKTNC
QALTA
In short
MKTN A real long/short stock book in an ETF: Federated Hermes' MDT quants buy one basket of US stocks and short another, aiming for gains that lean less on market direction. Costs 1.94% net of a waiver through March 1, 2027.
QALT One ticker, several hedge fund playbooks: SEI stacks sub-advisers running directional, event-driven and arbitrage strategies, and measures itself against 3-month T-bills instead of the S&P 500. It undercuts the typical alternatives fund on fees.
Stated mandate
MKTN The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation while limiting exposure to general stock-market risk through a quantitative, market-neutral strategy that selects long and short publicly traded common stocks.
QALT The fund seeks positive absolute returns across market cycles with reduced correlation to stocks and bonds. It pursues this through multiple underlying funds and sub-advisers using directional or tactical, event-driven, and arbitrage approaches.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
MKTN vs QALT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
MKTN vs QALT Cost
Overpaying MKTN vs QALT
$16,810
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
MKTN 1.94%
$32,156
QALT 0.80%
$15,346
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | MKTN | QALT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $3,289 | $1,422 | $1,867 |
| 20 | $11,859 | $5,393 | $6,466 |
| 30 | $32,156 | $15,346 | $16,810 |
- 1.94%MKTN
- 0.80%QALT, cheaper
- Middle half of Alternative Strategies funds
- Median 1.13%
QALT 4th cheapest of 29 funds
MKTN 23rd cheapest of 29 funds
MKTN vs QALT Dividends
- MKTN $0.07
- QALT $0.17
- MKTN Dec 31, 2025
- QALT Oct 5, 2026
- MKTN Jan 2, 2026
- QALT Oct 6, 2026
- MKTN Irregular
- QALT Quarterly
Distribution history
MKTN vs QALT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- MKTN 5.5%QALT 7.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- MKTN 1.52QALT 0.77
- Worst fall
- MKTN −4.1%QALT −4.9%
- Market sensitivity
- MKTN −0.16QALT 0.24
Popular comparisons
- 1.94% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.94% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.94% · 0.81%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.81%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.