HBDC ranks 1st and SHRT 23rd of 29 funds in the Alternative Strategies Category.
HBDC vs SHRT
HBDC −0.96pt a year
0.39%1.35%
SHRT 1.1×the volume
8.86K9.75K
HBDC vs SHRT Performance
+2.9%−4.6%
- HBDC 0.39%, better
- SHRT 1.35%
- HBDC $91M
- SHRT $13M
- HBDC +2.9%, better
- SHRT −4.6%
- HBDC 5.11%, better
- SHRT 0.07%
- HBDC 156
- SHRT 541
- HBDC 8.86K sh
- SHRT 9.75K sh, better
- HBDC $24.50
- SHRT $7.14
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | HBDC | SHRT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | D38 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B67Higher | F24 |
| Tradability | C50Higher | D32 |
| Holdings | A86 | |
| Durability | C49 | B55Higher |
Rank among Alternative Strategies funds
Same Category. HBDC and SHRT are both graded against the same 29 Alternative Strategies funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
HBDCA
SHRTD
In short
HBDC Private credit's lenders have to borrow too. HBDC owns the senior unsecured bonds that business development companies issue, a first-mover take on BDC debt instead of BDC stock, wrapped in a rules-based index.
SHRT One of the few ETFs built to lean against the market: Gotham's stock pickers run a long book and a bigger short book, targeting roughly 50% net short US equity exposure.
Stated mandate
HBDC The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the Solactive Hilton Capital BDC Corporate Bond TR Index.
SHRT The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation and positive returns during declining markets. It actively manages long and short equity and equity-related positions, primarily in companies traded on U.S. markets, targeting approximately 50% net short exposure.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
HBDC vs SHRT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
HBDC vs SHRT Cost
Overpaying SHRT vs HBDC
$16,215
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
HBDC 0.39%
$7,898
SHRT 1.35%
$24,113
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | HBDC | SHRT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $705 | $2,346 | $1,641 |
| 20 | $2,725 | $8,678 | $5,953 |
| 30 | $7,898 | $24,113 | $16,215 |
- 0.39%HBDC, cheaper
- 1.35%SHRT
- Middle half of Alternative Strategies funds
- Median 1.13%
HBDC cheapest of 29 funds
SHRT 19th cheapest of 29 funds
HBDC vs SHRT Dividends
- HBDC 5.11%, better
- SHRT 0.07%
- HBDC $1.25
- SHRT $0.0052
- HBDC $0.11
- SHRT $0.0052
- HBDC Oct 29, 2026
- SHRT Dec 10, 2025
- HBDC Oct 30, 2026
- SHRT Dec 11, 2025
- HBDC Monthly
- SHRT Annual
Distribution history
HBDC vs SHRT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- HBDC 2.5%SHRT 13.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- HBDC −0.27SHRT −0.68
- Worst fall
- HBDC −3.0%SHRT −27.8%
- Market sensitivity
- HBDC 0.13SHRT −0.61
HBDC and SHRT in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.39% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.35% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.81%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.35% · 0.81%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.35% · 0.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
