Skip to content

HEQT vs PEPS

Simplify Hedged Equity ETF

HEQTBNYSE Arca

Parametric Equity Plus ETF

PEPSBNasdaq

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

PEPS −0.38pt a year

HEQT0.48%PEPS0.10%

Avg volume · 30D

HEQT 178.7×the volume

HEQT65.1KPEPS364

HEQT vs PEPS Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+8.9%HEQT+11.7%PEPS

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. HEQT +8.9%. PEPS +11.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%0%5%15%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
HEQT 0.48%
PEPS 0.10%, better
Fund size
HEQT $307M
PEPS $29M
1Y total return
HEQT +8.9%
PEPS +11.7%, better
Yield (12M)
HEQT 1.17%, better
PEPS 0.97%
Holdings
HEQT 5
PEPS 203
Avg volume (30D)
HEQT 65.1K sh, better
PEPS 364 sh
NAV per share
HEQT $34.16
PEPS $32.59
52W range

ETF.net Grade

HEQT: Cost 69, Risk 65, Mission not scored, Tradability 58, Holdings 37, Durability 57. PEPS: Cost 100, Risk 24, Mission not scored, Tradability 31, Holdings 74, Durability 39.
Pillar letters and Scores for HEQT, PEPS, with each pillar’s weight
PillarHEQTPEPS
Cost30% weightB69A100Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB65HigherF24
Tradability15% weightB58HigherD31
Holdings10% weightD37A74Higher
Durability5% weightB57HigherD39

Rank among S&P 500 Option Income funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. HEQT and PEPS are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Option Income⁠

Category · 51 funds
See all 51 ›

PEPS ranks 20th and HEQT 23rd of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Option Income Category.

  1. Rank 20BISPYProShares S&P 500 High Income ETFScore 63
  2. Rank 20BPEPSParametric Equity Plus ETFScore 63
  3. Rank 20BXPAYRoundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETFScore 63
  4. Rank 23BHEMIHartford Equity Premium Income ETFScore 61
  5. Rank 23BHEQTSimplify Hedged Equity ETFScore 61
  6. Rank 23BXRMIGlobal X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETFScore 61

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

HEQTBSimplify Hedged Equity ETF

PEPSBParametric Equity Plus ETF

In short

HEQT Most S&P 500 options funds sell calls to pump out income. HEQT flips the priority: a put/spread collar aimed at softening drawdowns and volatility, with long-term appreciation as the stated goal. Distributions land quarterly.

PEPS Active management at index-fund pricing. PEPS holds a U.S. large-cap base, then writes S&P 500 calls against offsetting long exposure: a beta-neutral overlay built to add return rather than swap upside for income.

Stated mandate

HEQT The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through primarily U.S. large-cap equity exposure, while using a put/spread collar option overlay intended to reduce downside risk and volatility.

PEPS The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation. It is actively managed, using a U.S. large-cap equity base and beta-neutral call overwriting on the S&P 500 with offsetting long exposure to seek incremental total return.

Why people hold it

  • HEQT Hedge-first, not yield-first: the option overlay exists to reduce downside risk and volatility rather than maximize payouts.simplify.us
  • Fee of 0.53% a year undercuts the median in its 51-fund S&P 500 options cohort, unusual for a strategy this hands-on.
  • Lands in the upper half of that crowded cohort, with risk control the strongest part of the build.
  • The reference point is the S&P 500 itself, so what sits under the options is familiar US large-cap equity.simplify.us
  • PEPS 0.10% is index-fund pricing for an actively managed strategy. Even the cheap, well-regarded active peers cost more: DFAU at 0.12%, FELC at 0.18%.
  • Not a covered-call fund. The sold S&P 500 calls are paired with offsetting long exposure, so the overlay seeks incremental total return instead of capping upside.
  • Ordinary 1940 Act ETF wrapper, U.S. large-cap equity, distributions paid quarterly. The complexity lives in the overlay, not the tax paperwork.
  • Cost is the standout: the typical active U.S. equity ETF in this group charges several times what PEPS does, and fee drag is the one input you know in advance.

Worth knowing

  • HEQT A collar cuts both ways: the calls sold to help pay for the puts also trim participation in a strong rally.simplify.us
  • Cheaper options-on-the-S&P builds exist in the same lane, including IVVW at 0.25% and PBP at 0.29%, though neither runs this collar.
  • Trading is moderate rather than heavy, so spreads can run wider than the category's busiest names.
  • PEPS Launched in November 2024. The overlay has not yet run through a full market cycle, so there is limited history to judge it on.
  • A small, thinly traded fund. Bid-ask spreads can run wider than a mega-cap index ETF's, which shows up most on larger orders.
  • The options leg adds moving parts: short index calls lose value in a sharp rally, and the offsetting long exposure is what has to make that back.

Full HEQT profile⁠

Full PEPS profile⁠

HEQT vs PEPS Holdings

How HEQT and PEPS differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of HEQT and 0.0% of PEPS.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Asset classEquity100%
  • Countryby domicile99.5%

Sector

No Sector split for PEPS.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in HEQT and PEPS, widest gap first
CountryMore in HEQTMore in PEPS
United StatesHEQT +0.3 points
ChinaPEPS +0.3 points
SwitzerlandHEQT +0.2 points
BrazilPEPS +0.2 points
MexicoSame weight
IrelandSame weight
United KingdomSame weight
FinlandSame weight

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • HEQT100.5%
  • PEPS38.5%

Securities held

  • HEQT4
  • PEPS202

Asset class

HEQT
Equity
PEPS
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in HEQT4
  • In both0
  • Only in PEPS202

Only in HEQT

4 securities, 100% of HEQT by weight

  • Ishares Core S+p 500 Etf99.36%
  • SPX US 01/15/27 P7330 Index0.55%
  • SPX US 12/18/26 P7260 Index0.36%

Only in PEPS

202 securities, 100% of PEPS by weight

  • Apple Inc Common Stock7.48%
  • NVIDIA Corp Common Stock6.80%
  • Microsoft Corp Common5.70%

Weight gaps

HEQT and PEPS share no securities.

All 11 HEQT holdings⁠All PEPS holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

HEQT vs PEPS Cost

Overpaying HEQT vs PEPS

$7,499

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • HEQT 0.48%

    $9,605

  • PEPS 0.10%

    $2,106

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • HEQT 0.48%
  • PEPS 0.10%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530HEQT $9,605PEPS $2,106

Year by year

YearHEQTPEPSOverpaying
10$865$183$682
20$3,328$717$2,611
30$9,605$2,106$7,499

Expense ratio

  • 0.48%HEQT
  • 0.10%PEPS, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Option Income funds
  • Median 0.60%

PEPS cheapest of 51 funds

HEQT 16th cheapest of 51 funds

HEQT vs PEPS Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
HEQT 1.17%, better
PEPS 0.97%
Payout (12M)
HEQT $0.40
PEPS $0.32
Last payment
HEQT $0.10
PEPS $0.09
Ex-dividend
HEQT Sep 25, 2026
PEPS Sep 21, 2026
Paid on
HEQT Sep 30, 2026
PEPS Sep 25, 2026
Frequency
HEQT Quarterly
PEPS Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2021 to 2026, same scale for both

HEQTQuarterly · 18 paymentsAll HEQT payments⁠
One bar per payment. 18 payments from 2021 to 2026 YTD. Dec 27, 2021 $0.07; Jun 27, 2022 $0.08; Dec 27, 2022 $0.81; Mar 27, 2023 $0.08; Jun 27, 2023 $0.08; Sep 27, 2023 $0.08; Dec 26, 2023 $0.80; Mar 25, 2024 $0.10; Jun 25, 2024 $0.10; Sep 25, 2024 $0.08; Dec 23, 2024 $0.10; Mar 26, 2025 $0.08; Jun 25, 2025 $0.10; Sep 25, 2025 $0.10; Dec 23, 2025 $0.10; Mar 26, 2026 $0.10; Jun 25, 2026 $0.10; Sep 25, 2026 $0.10. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD
PEPSQuarterly · 8 paymentsAll PEPS payments⁠
One bar per payment. 8 payments from 2021 to 2026 YTD. Dec 23, 2024 $0.04; Mar 24, 2025 $0.07; Jun 23, 2025 $0.06; Sep 22, 2025 $0.07; Dec 23, 2025 $0.10; Mar 23, 2026 $0.06; Jun 22, 2026 $0.08; Sep 21, 2026 $0.09. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD

HEQT vs PEPS Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
HEQT 6.9%PEPS 12.9%since Dec 2024
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
HEQT 1.46PEPS 0.85since Dec 2024
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
HEQT −11.9%since Nov 2021PEPS −21.3%since Nov 2024
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
HEQT 0.56PEPS 1.02

HEQT and PEPS in the news

Popular comparisons

  • HEQTBvsCSHIA

    Simplify Hedged Equity ETF · Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.48% · 0.38%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PEPSBvsCSHIA

    Parametric Equity Plus ETF · Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.10% · 0.38%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • HEQTBvsBALIA

    Simplify Hedged Equity ETF · iShares U.S. Large Cap Premium Income Active ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.48% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PEPSBvsBALIA

    Parametric Equity Plus ETF · iShares U.S. Large Cap Premium Income Active ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.10% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • HEQTBvsIVVWA

    Simplify Hedged Equity ETF · iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.48% · 0.25%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PEPSBvsIVVWA

    Parametric Equity Plus ETF · iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.10% · 0.25%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.