QALT ranks 4th and HFEQ 12th of 29 funds in the Alternative Strategies Category.
HFEQ vs QALT
QALT −0.16pt a year
0.96%0.80%
QALT 1.9×the volume
9.35K17.7K
HFEQ vs QALT Performance
+6.7%+6.6%
- HFEQ 0.96%
- QALT 0.80%, better
- HFEQ $12M
- QALT $195M
- HFEQ +6.7%, better
- QALT +6.6%
- HFEQ 21
- QALT 26
- HFEQ 9.35K sh
- QALT 17.7K sh, better
- HFEQ $23.17
- QALT $25.87
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | HFEQ | QALT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A74 | A90Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C41 | B65Higher |
| Tradability | C46 | B57Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | D29 | B65Higher |
Rank among Alternative Strategies funds
Same Category. HFEQ and QALT are both graded against the same 29 Alternative Strategies funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
HFEQB
QALTA
In short
HFEQ Hedge fund replication, sliced thin. HFEQ assembles a long/short equity book from broad ETFs and futures to mirror the gross-of-fees returns of the hedge fund industry's equity long/short sector, dialed to roughly twice that sector's volatility, for 0.96% a year.
QALT One ticker, several hedge fund playbooks: SEI stacks sub-advisers running directional, event-driven and arbitrage strategies, and measures itself against 3-month T-bills instead of the S&P 500. It undercuts the typical alternatives fund on fees.
Stated mandate
HFEQ The Fund seeks capital appreciation through an actively managed equity long/short strategy. It uses long and short positions in broad-based ETFs and futures contracts, and may also use individual equities and swaps to approximate the Equity Long/Short sector's returns with higher volatility.
QALT The fund seeks positive absolute returns across market cycles with reduced correlation to stocks and bonds. It pursues this through multiple underlying funds and sub-advisers using directional or tactical, event-driven, and arbitrage approaches.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
HFEQ vs QALT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
HFEQ vs QALT Cost
Overpaying HFEQ vs QALT
$2,688
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
HFEQ 0.96%
$18,034
QALT 0.80%
$15,346
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | HFEQ | QALT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,695 | $1,422 | $273 |
| 20 | $6,383 | $5,393 | $990 |
| 30 | $18,034 | $15,346 | $2,688 |
- 0.96%HFEQ
- 0.80%QALT, cheaper
- Middle half of Alternative Strategies funds
- Median 1.13%
QALT 4th cheapest of 29 funds
HFEQ 9th cheapest of 29 funds
HFEQ vs QALT Dividends
- HFEQ $2.20
- QALT $0.17
- HFEQ Dec 24, 2025
- QALT Oct 5, 2026
- HFEQ Dec 26, 2025
- QALT Oct 6, 2026
- HFEQ Irregular
- QALT Quarterly
Distribution history
HFEQ vs QALT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- HFEQ QALT 7.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- HFEQ QALT 0.77
- Worst fall
- HFEQ QALT −4.9%
- Market sensitivity
- HFEQ 1.06QALT 0.24
Popular comparisons
- 0.96% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 0.81%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.81%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.