TMF ranks 4th and HIBL 23rd of 30 funds in the 3x Leveraged Long Category.
HIBL vs TMF
TMF −0.08pt a year
0.98%0.90%
TMF 107.3×the volume
54.5K5.85M
HIBL +32.7pt
−2.3%−35.0%
HIBL vs TMF Performance
−11.0%−88.4%
- HIBL 0.98%
- TMF 0.90%, better
- HIBL $57M
- TMF $1.96B
- HIBL +22.3%, better
- TMF −22.7%
- HIBL 2.02%
- TMF 4.62%, better
- HIBL 107
- TMF 14
- HIBL 54.5K sh
- TMF 5.85M sh, better
- HIBL $62.86
- TMF $30.21
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | HIBL | TMF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D38 | A87Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | D31 | C49Higher |
| Tradability | D26 | A83Higher |
| Holdings | A100 | |
| Durability | D30 | B65Higher |
Rank among 3x Leveraged Long funds
Same Category. HIBL and TMF are both graded against the same 30 3x Leveraged Long funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
HIBLD
TMFA
In short
HIBL Most 3x funds lever a sector you can name. HIBL levers a factor: the 100 jumpiest stocks in the S&P 500, weighted by how hard they swing, then geared to 300% of that index's daily move.
TMF Three times the daily move of long-dated Treasuries, reset every day. Where most 3x funds aim at stocks, TMF points its leverage at the 20-year-plus end of the curve, and has been doing it since 2009.
Stated mandate
HIBL The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 300% of the performance of the S&P 500 High Beta Index, before fees and expenses. Its objective applies for a single day and is not intended to provide three times the index's cumulative return over longer periods.
TMF The Fund seeks pre-fee and expense investment results equal to 300% of the daily performance of the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. It is designed for a single trading day, and longer-period results may differ because daily returns compound.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
HIBL vs TMF Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
HIBL vs TMF Cost
Overpaying HIBL vs TMF
$1,322
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
HIBL 0.98%
$18,362
TMF 0.90%
$17,040
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | HIBL | TMF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,729 | $1,593 | $136 |
| 20 | $6,504 | $6,015 | $489 |
| 30 | $18,362 | $17,040 | $1,322 |
- 0.98%HIBL
- 0.90%TMF, cheaper
- Middle half of 3x Leveraged Long funds
- Median 0.96%
TMF 5th cheapest of 30 funds
HIBL 18th cheapest of 30 funds
HIBL vs TMF Dividends
- HIBL 2.02%
- TMF 4.62%, better
- HIBL $1.49
- TMF $1.40
- HIBL $0.07
- TMF $0.35
- HIBL Jun 23, 2026
- TMF Sep 22, 2026
- HIBL Jun 30, 2026
- TMF Sep 29, 2026
- HIBL Twice a year
- TMF Quarterly
Distribution history
HIBL vs TMF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- HIBL
- TMF
Risk facts
- Volatility
- HIBL 71.5%TMF 40.2%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- HIBL 0.92, betterTMF −0.07
- Worst fall
- HIBL −81.2%, betterTMF −90.9%
- Market sensitivity
- HIBL 4.49TMF 7.22
Popular comparisons
- 0.98% · 0.78%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.90% · 0.78%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.88%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.90% · 0.88%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.90% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.