LQDW ranks 1st and HOLA 9th of 25 funds in the Index Option Income Category.
HOLA vs LQDW
LQDW −0.34pt a year
0.68%0.34%
LQDW 8.3×the volume
13K109K
HOLA vs LQDW Performance
+9.7%+2.5%
- HOLA 0.68%
- LQDW 0.34%, better
- HOLA $281M
- LQDW $350M
- HOLA +9.7%, better
- LQDW +2.5%
- HOLA
- LQDW 12.37%
- HOLA 219
- LQDW 3221
- HOLA 13K sh
- LQDW 109K sh, better
- HOLA $54.51
- LQDW $22.65
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | HOLA | LQDW |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A73 | A100Higher |
| Mission | A96 | |
| Risk | B69Higher | B66 |
| Tradability | F20 | A77Higher |
| Holdings | A71 | A100Higher |
| Durability | A84Higher | A83 |
Rank among Index Option Income funds
Same Category. HOLA and LQDW are both graded against the same 25 Index Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
HOLAB
LQDWA
In short
HOLA Most options overlays abroad exist to crank out income. HOLA runs the other playbook: a few hundred developed-market stocks shaped like the MSCI EAFE Index, with a laddered options overlay built to cushion falling markets rather than to fund a fat payout.
LQDW Covered calls, but on bonds. LQDW owns iShares' flagship investment-grade corporate bond fund and writes monthly calls against it, paying distributions monthly, at less than half the option-income cohort's median fee.
Stated mandate
HOLA The fund seeks capital appreciation from a diversified international equity portfolio while hedging overall market exposure. Its approach combines international-stock selection with a laddered options strategy intended to reduce downside risk.
LQDW The fund seeks to track a strategy holding LQD while writing monthly covered calls to generate income.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
HOLA vs LQDW Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
HOLA vs LQDW Cost
Overpaying HOLA vs LQDW
$6,320
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
HOLA 0.68%
$13,252
LQDW 0.34%
$6,932
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | HOLA | LQDW | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,215 | $616 | $599 |
| 20 | $4,633 | $2,386 | $2,247 |
| 30 | $13,252 | $6,932 | $6,320 |
- 0.68%HOLA
- 0.34%LQDW, cheaper
- Middle half of Index Option Income funds
- Median 0.81%
LQDW cheapest of 25 funds
HOLA 7th cheapest of 25 funds
HOLA vs LQDW Dividends
- HOLA
- LQDW 12.37%
- HOLA
- LQDW $2.81
- HOLA $1.58
- LQDW $0.31
- HOLA Dec 16, 2025
- LQDW Nov 3, 2026
- HOLA Dec 18, 2025
- LQDW Nov 6, 2026
- HOLA Irregular
- LQDW Monthly
Distribution history
HOLA vs LQDW Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- HOLA 7.4%LQDW 4.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- HOLA 1.03LQDW 0.16
- Worst fall
- HOLA −7.0%LQDW −9.2%
- Market sensitivity
- HOLA 0.32LQDW 0.59
HOLA and LQDW in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.68% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.34% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.68% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.34% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.68% · 0.44%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.34% · 0.44%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
