EFAA ranks 2nd and HOLA 9th of 25 funds in the Index Option Income Category.
EFAA vs HOLA
EFAA −0.29pt a year
0.39%0.68%
EFAA 6.8×the volume
88.1K13K
EFAA vs HOLA Performance
+13.1%+9.7%
- EFAA 0.39%, better
- HOLA 0.68%
- EFAA $666M
- HOLA $281M
- EFAA +13.1%, better
- HOLA +9.7%
- EFAA 8.40%
- HOLA
- EFAA 683
- HOLA 219
- EFAA 88.1K sh, better
- HOLA 13K sh
- EFAA $53.67
- HOLA $54.51
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EFAA | HOLA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A96Higher | A73 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B61 | B69Higher |
| Tradability | B57Higher | F20 |
| Holdings | A77Higher | A71 |
| Durability | A79 | A84Higher |
Rank among Index Option Income funds
Same Category. EFAA and HOLA are both graded against the same 25 Index Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EFAAA
HOLAB
In short
EFAA An MSCI EAFE index core with an option-income overlay running on only about half the portfolio, so the rest keeps its upside uncapped. The fee is 0.39% net of a waiver through August 31, 2027, below the typical option-income fund.
HOLA Most options overlays abroad exist to crank out income. HOLA runs the other playbook: a few hundred developed-market stocks shaped like the MSCI EAFE Index, with a laddered options overlay built to cushion falling markets rather than to fund a fat payout.
Stated mandate
EFAA The fund seeks total return through current income and long-term capital growth while providing MSCI EAFE exposure through an active option-income overlay intended to generate income and help mitigate downside risk.
HOLA The fund seeks capital appreciation from a diversified international equity portfolio while hedging overall market exposure. Its approach combines international-stock selection with a laddered options strategy intended to reduce downside risk.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EFAA vs HOLA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EFAA vs HOLA Cost
Overpaying HOLA vs EFAA
$5,354
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EFAA 0.39%
$7,898
HOLA 0.68%
$13,252
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EFAA | HOLA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $705 | $1,215 | $510 |
| 20 | $2,725 | $4,633 | $1,908 |
| 30 | $7,898 | $13,252 | $5,354 |
- 0.39%EFAA, cheaper
- 0.68%HOLA
- Middle half of Index Option Income funds
- Median 0.81%
EFAA 2nd cheapest of 25 funds
HOLA 7th cheapest of 25 funds
EFAA vs HOLA Dividends
- EFAA 8.40%
- HOLA
- EFAA $4.62
- HOLA
- EFAA $0.38
- HOLA $1.58
- EFAA Oct 19, 2026
- HOLA Dec 16, 2025
- EFAA Oct 23, 2026
- HOLA Dec 18, 2025
- EFAA Monthly
- HOLA Irregular
Distribution history
EFAA vs HOLA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EFAA 8.4%HOLA 7.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- EFAA 1.02HOLA 1.03
- Worst fall
- EFAA −12.0%HOLA −7.0%
- Market sensitivity
- EFAA 0.36HOLA 0.32
Popular comparisons
- 0.39% · 0.34%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.68% · 0.34%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.68% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.44%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.68% · 0.44%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.