ILCV ranks 2nd and HQGO 84th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
HQGO vs ILCV
ILCV −0.30pt a year
0.34%0.04%
ILCV 28.9×the volume
86925.1K
HQGO vs ILCV Performance
+11.5%+22.4%
- HQGO 0.34%
- ILCV 0.04%, better
- HQGO $5M
- ILCV $1.37B
- HQGO +11.5%
- ILCV +22.4%, better
- HQGO 0.52%
- ILCV 1.50%, better
- HQGO 190
- ILCV 374
- HQGO 869 sh
- ILCV 25.1K sh, better
- HQGO $64.16
- ILCV $108.28
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | HQGO | ILCV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C46 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A90Higher | A82 |
| Risk | D39 | A91Higher |
| Tradability | C42 | B62Higher |
| Holdings | D37 | D39Higher |
| Durability | F24 | A82Higher |
Rank among US Multifactor funds
Same Category. HQGO and ILCV are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
HQGOC
ILCVA
In short
HQGO Hartford's growth sleeve with a seatbelt: an in-house index that leans on growth and quality while keeping a foot in value and momentum, packed into roughly 100 US stocks. Young, small, and priced above plain index growth.
ILCV Value done the thorough way: roughly 400 large- and mid-cap US stocks screened on five separate value measures, not just cheap book value. Running since 2004 at four basis points, it's one of the cheapest tickets into the value factor.
Stated mandate
HQGO The Fund seeks to provide total returns corresponding to the Hartford US Quality Growth Index, which invests in U.S. equities emphasizing growth and quality while retaining exposure to value and momentum.
ILCV The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. large- and mid-cap stocks selected with value-oriented measures including forward earnings, book value, sales, cash flow, and dividend yield.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
HQGO vs ILCV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
HQGO vs ILCV Cost
Overpaying HQGO vs ILCV
$6,083
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
HQGO 0.34%
$6,932
ILCV 0.04%
$849
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | HQGO | ILCV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $616 | $73 | $543 |
| 20 | $2,386 | $288 | $2,098 |
| 30 | $6,932 | $849 | $6,083 |
- 0.34%HQGO
- 0.04%ILCV, cheaper
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
ILCV cheapest of 99 funds
HQGO 53rd cheapest of 99 funds
HQGO vs ILCV Dividends
- HQGO 0.52%
- ILCV 1.50%, better
- HQGO $0.34
- ILCV $1.65
- HQGO $0.10
- ILCV $0.42
- HQGO Sep 25, 2026
- ILCV Sep 15, 2026
- HQGO Sep 29, 2026
- ILCV Sep 18, 2026
- HQGO Quarterly
- ILCV Quarterly
Distribution history
HQGO vs ILCV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- HQGO 12.7%ILCV 10.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- HQGO 1.01ILCV 1.57
- Worst fall
- HQGO −20.9%ILCV −18.6%
- Market sensitivity
- HQGO 1.07ILCV 0.82
Popular comparisons
- 0.34% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.34% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.34% · 0.14%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.14%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.