VYM ranks 2nd and HQGO 84th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
HQGO vs VYM
VYM −0.30pt a year
0.34%0.04%
VYM 1322.7×the volume
8691.15M
HQGO vs VYM Performance
+11.5%+18.9%
- HQGO 0.34%
- VYM 0.04%, better
- HQGO $5M
- VYM $78.9B
- HQGO +11.5%
- VYM +18.9%, better
- HQGO 0.52%
- VYM 2.26%, better
- HQGO 190
- VYM 610
- HQGO 869 sh
- VYM 1.15M sh, better
- HQGO $64.16
- VYM $159.07
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | HQGO | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C46 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A90Higher | A81 |
| Risk | D39 | A82Higher |
| Tradability | C42 | B61Higher |
| Holdings | D37 | C53Higher |
| Durability | F24 | A94Higher |
Rank among US Multifactor funds
Same Category. HQGO and VYM are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
HQGOC
VYMA
In short
HQGO Hartford's growth sleeve with a seatbelt: an in-house index that leans on growth and quality while keeping a foot in value and momentum, packed into roughly 100 US stocks. Young, small, and priced above plain index growth.
VYM The no-frills dividend workhorse. VYM buys the higher-yielding end of the US market, roughly 600 names, for four basis points: no quality screen, no dividend-growth-streak test, just yield, at scale since 2006.
Stated mandate
HQGO The Fund seeks to provide total returns corresponding to the Hartford US Quality Growth Index, which invests in U.S. equities emphasizing growth and quality while retaining exposure to value and momentum.
VYM The Fund seeks to track a benchmark index measuring the investment return of common stocks from companies characterized by high dividend yields.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
HQGO vs VYM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
HQGO vs VYM Cost
Overpaying HQGO vs VYM
$6,083
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
HQGO 0.34%
$6,932
VYM 0.04%
$849
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | HQGO | VYM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $616 | $73 | $543 |
| 20 | $2,386 | $288 | $2,098 |
| 30 | $6,932 | $849 | $6,083 |
- 0.34%HQGO
- 0.04%VYM, cheaper
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
VYM cheapest of 99 funds
HQGO 53rd cheapest of 99 funds
HQGO vs VYM Dividends
- HQGO 0.52%
- VYM 2.26%, better
- HQGO $0.34
- VYM $3.68
- HQGO $0.10
- VYM $0.89
- HQGO Sep 25, 2026
- VYM Sep 18, 2026
- HQGO Sep 29, 2026
- VYM Sep 22, 2026
- HQGO Quarterly
- VYM Quarterly
Distribution history
HQGO vs VYM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- HQGO 12.7%VYM 11.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- HQGO 1.01VYM 1.38
- Worst fall
- HQGO −20.9%VYM −15.9%
- Market sensitivity
- HQGO 1.07VYM 0.74
HQGO and VYM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.34% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.34% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.34% · 0.14%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.14%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


