SCZ ranks 1st and HSCZ 12th of 16 funds in the International Small-Cap Category.
HSCZ vs SCZ
SCZ −0.43pt a year
0.83%0.40%
SCZ 57.2×the volume
22.7K1.3M
HSCZ +3.5pt
+11.6%+8.1%
HSCZ vs SCZ Performance
+63.3%+26.9%
- HSCZ 0.83%
- SCZ 0.40%, better
- HSCZ $257M
- SCZ $12.7B
- HSCZ +15.8%, better
- SCZ +13.1%
- HSCZ 3.12%
- SCZ 3.20%, better
- HSCZ 2036
- SCZ 2039
- HSCZ 22.7K sh
- SCZ 1.3M sh, better
- HSCZ $42.56
- SCZ $82.65
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | HSCZ | SCZ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F0 | A70Higher |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | A89Higher | C49 |
| Tradability | A74 | A92Higher |
| Holdings | A74 | A76Higher |
| Durability | B57 | A85Higher |
Rank among International Small-Cap funds
Same Category. HSCZ and SCZ are both graded against the same 16 International Small-Cap funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
HSCZC
SCZA
In short
HSCZ The hedged twin of the standard EAFE small-cap fund: the same universe of smaller companies in developed markets outside the US and Canada, with the currency swing dialed out by tracking a 100% hedged-to-USD index.
SCZ The purist's take on foreign small caps: developed markets only, outside the US and Canada. Trading since 2007, SCZ follows the MSCI EAFE Small Cap Index, so Japan, Europe and Australia are in and emerging markets stay out.
Stated mandate
HSCZ The fund seeks to track an index of small-cap equities in international markets excluding the United States and Canada, while reducing the effect of currency fluctuations.
SCZ The fund seeks to track an index of small-cap equities from developed markets outside the United States and Canada, providing international diversification and exposure to overseas small-cap stocks.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
HSCZ vs SCZ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
HSCZ vs SCZ Cost
Overpaying HSCZ vs SCZ
$7,769
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
HSCZ 0.83%
$15,859
SCZ 0.40%
$8,090
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | HSCZ | SCZ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,474 | $723 | $751 |
| 20 | $5,581 | $2,793 | $2,788 |
| 30 | $15,859 | $8,090 | $7,769 |
- 0.83%HSCZ
- 0.40%SCZ, cheaper
- Middle half of International Small-Cap funds
- Median 0.44%
SCZ 6th cheapest of 16 funds
HSCZ 16th cheapest of 16 funds
HSCZ vs SCZ Dividends
- HSCZ 3.12%
- SCZ 3.20%, better
- HSCZ $1.34
- SCZ $2.67
- HSCZ $0.57
- SCZ $1.17
- HSCZ Jul 2, 2026
- SCZ Jun 15, 2026
- HSCZ Jul 8, 2026
- SCZ Jun 18, 2026
- HSCZ Twice a year
- SCZ Twice a year
Distribution history
HSCZ vs SCZ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- HSCZ
- SCZ
Risk facts
- Volatility
- HSCZ 9.3%, betterSCZ 13.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- HSCZ 1.56, betterSCZ 1.04
- Worst fall
- HSCZ −19.9%, betterSCZ −35.5%
- Market sensitivity
- HSCZ 0.60SCZ 1.00
Popular comparisons
- 0.83% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.83% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.83% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.