SCYB ranks 1st and HYBX 75th of 84 funds in the US High Yield Category.
HYBX vs SCYB
SCYB −0.47pt a year
0.50%0.03%
SCYB 287.9×the volume
3.96K1.14M
HYBX vs SCYB Performance
+3.2%+2.6%
- HYBX 0.50%
- SCYB 0.03%, better
- HYBX $27M
- SCYB $2.73B
- HYBX +3.2%, better
- SCYB +2.6%
- HYBX 8.08%, better
- SCYB 7.16%
- HYBX 258
- SCYB 1838
- HYBX 3.96K sh
- SCYB 1.14M sh, better
- HYBX $28.75
- SCYB $25.18
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | HYBX | SCYB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D35 | A100Higher |
| Mission | F0 | A100Higher |
| Risk | C49 | B60Higher |
| Tradability | F9 | A79Higher |
| Holdings | A71 | A99Higher |
| Durability | C52 | B68Higher |
Rank among US High Yield funds
Same Category. HYBX and SCYB are both graded against the same 84 US High Yield funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
HYBXD
SCYBA
In short
HYBX A 1989-vintage junk-bond fund that traded its mutual fund wrapper for an ETF in 2024. TCW picks bonds one issuer at a time, chasing income with fewer credit blowups than owning the whole high yield market.
SCYB Three basis points for the broad US high-yield corporate market. Schwab undercuts a category where the typical fund charges more than ten times as much, spreading the bet across roughly 1,800 bonds and paying monthly.
Stated mandate
HYBX The SEC filing identifies HYBX as an actively managed fixed-income ETF named TCW High Yield Bond ETF.
SCYB The fund follows a rules-based strategy intended to track the high-yield bond market, primarily through bonds in the Bloomberg Barclays US Corporate High Yield Total Return Index and similar derivatives.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
HYBX vs SCYB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
HYBX vs SCYB Cost
Overpaying HYBX vs SCYB
$9,341
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
HYBX 0.50%
$9,979
SCYB 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | HYBX | SCYB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $55 | $845 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $216 | $3,244 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $638 | $9,341 |
- 0.50%HYBX
- 0.03%SCYB, cheaper
- Middle half of US High Yield funds
- Median 0.42%
SCYB cheapest of 84 funds
HYBX 55th cheapest of 84 funds
HYBX vs SCYB Dividends
- HYBX 8.08%, better
- SCYB 7.16%
- HYBX $2.33
- SCYB $1.81
- HYBX $0.18
- SCYB $0.16
- HYBX Nov 2, 2026
- SCYB Nov 2, 2026
- HYBX Nov 4, 2026
- SCYB Nov 6, 2026
- HYBX Monthly
- SCYB Monthly
Distribution history
HYBX vs SCYB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- HYBX 3.3%SCYB 4.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- HYBX 0.08SCYB 0.82
- Worst fall
- HYBX −4.2%SCYB −4.9%
- Market sensitivity
- HYBX 0.56SCYB 0.28
HYBX and SCYB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
