SCYB ranks 1st and HYDW 19th of 84 funds in the US High Yield Category.
HYDW vs SCYB
SCYB −0.17pt a year
0.20%0.03%
SCYB 231.2×the volume
4.78K1.1M
SCYB +0.8pt
+7.6%+8.4%
HYDW vs SCYB Performance
+3.1%+2.0%
- HYDW 0.20%
- SCYB 0.03%, better
- HYDW $62M
- SCYB $2.8B
- HYDW +3.1%, better
- SCYB +2.0%
- HYDW 5.57%
- SCYB 7.14%, better
- HYDW 570
- SCYB 1844
- HYDW 4.78K sh
- SCYB 1.1M sh, better
- HYDW $46.10
- SCYB $25.22
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | HYDW | SCYB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A87 | A100Higher |
| Mission | A83 | A100Higher |
| Risk | A70Higher | B59 |
| Tradability | D28 | A88Higher |
| Holdings | A73 | A99Higher |
| Durability | B55 | B68Higher |
Rank among US High Yield funds
Same Category. HYDW and SCYB are both graded against the same 84 US High Yield funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
HYDWA
SCYBA
In short
HYDW High yield with the volatility dial turned down. HYDW tracks a Solactive index that screens the junk bond market for lower-beta issues, and charges half the fee its category typically asks.
SCYB Three basis points for the broad US high-yield corporate market. Schwab undercuts a category where the typical fund charges more than ten times as much, spreading the bet across roughly 1,800 bonds and paying monthly.
Stated mandate
HYDW The fund passively seeks to track the performance of a Solactive index covering U.S.-dollar high-yield corporate bonds with potentially lower beta than the broader high-yield corporate bond market.
SCYB The fund follows a rules-based strategy intended to track the high-yield bond market, primarily through bonds in the Bloomberg Barclays US Corporate High Yield Total Return Index and similar derivatives.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
HYDW vs SCYB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
HYDW vs SCYB Cost
Overpaying HYDW vs SCYB
$3,517
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
HYDW 0.20%
$4,155
SCYB 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | HYDW | SCYB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $365 | $55 | $310 |
| 20 | $1,421 | $216 | $1,205 |
| 30 | $4,155 | $638 | $3,517 |
- 0.20%HYDW
- 0.03%SCYB, cheaper
- Middle half of US High Yield funds
- Median 0.42%
SCYB cheapest of 84 funds
HYDW 10th cheapest of 84 funds
HYDW vs SCYB Dividends
- HYDW 5.57%
- SCYB 7.14%, better
- HYDW $2.57
- SCYB $1.80
- HYDW $0.21
- SCYB $0.16
- HYDW Oct 1, 2026
- SCYB Oct 1, 2026
- HYDW Oct 8, 2026
- SCYB Oct 7, 2026
- HYDW Monthly
- SCYB Monthly
Distribution history
HYDW vs SCYB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- HYDW 3.9%, betterSCYB 4.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- HYDW 0.77SCYB 0.82, better
- Worst fall
- HYDW −12.7%SCYB −4.9%
- Market sensitivity
- HYDW 0.58SCYB 0.28
HYDW and SCYB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.20% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
