SCYB ranks 2nd and HYG 24th of 84 funds in the US High Yield Category.
HYG vs SCYB
SCYB −0.46pt a year
0.49%0.03%
HYG 37.4×the volume
42.3M1.13M
SCYB +0.1pt
+7.3%+7.4%
HYG vs SCYB Performance
+1.9%+2.2%
- HYG 0.49%
- SCYB 0.03%, better
- HYG $17.5B
- SCYB $2.78B
- HYG +1.9%
- SCYB +2.2%, better
- HYG 6.09%
- SCYB 7.20%, better
- HYG 1329
- SCYB 1847
- HYG 42.3M sh, better
- SCYB 1.13M sh
- HYG $76.94
- SCYB $25.11
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | HYG | SCYB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D35 | A100Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | B60 | B60 |
| Tradability | A74 | A78Higher |
| Holdings | A95 | A99Higher |
| Durability | A95Higher | B68 |
Rank among US High Yield funds
Same Category. HYG and SCYB are both graded against the same 84 US High Yield funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
HYGB
SCYBA
In short
HYG A 2007-vintage junk bond ETF built around liquidity: a multi-billion-dollar fund, heavily traded, tracking an index screened for the market's more tradable bonds. The trade-off is a fee well above the category's cheapest.
SCYB Three basis points for the broad US high-yield corporate market. Schwab undercuts a category where the typical fund charges more than ten times as much, spreading the bet across roughly 1,800 bonds and paying monthly.
Stated mandate
HYG The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. dollar-denominated high-yield corporate bonds.
SCYB The fund follows a rules-based strategy intended to track the high-yield bond market, primarily through bonds in the Bloomberg Barclays US Corporate High Yield Total Return Index and similar derivatives.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
HYG vs SCYB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
HYG vs SCYB Cost
Overpaying HYG vs SCYB
$9,154
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
HYG 0.49%
$9,792
SCYB 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | HYG | SCYB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $883 | $55 | $828 |
| 20 | $3,394 | $216 | $3,178 |
| 30 | $9,792 | $638 | $9,154 |
- 0.49%HYG
- 0.03%SCYB, cheaper
- Middle half of US High Yield funds
- Median 0.42%
SCYB cheapest of 84 funds
HYG 53rd cheapest of 84 funds
HYG vs SCYB Dividends
- HYG 6.09%
- SCYB 7.20%, better
- HYG $4.69
- SCYB $1.81
- HYG $0.40
- SCYB $0.16
- HYG Nov 2, 2026
- SCYB Nov 2, 2026
- HYG Pays Nov 5, 2026
- SCYB Pays Nov 6, 2026
- HYG Monthly
- SCYB Monthly
Distribution history
HYG vs SCYB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- HYG 4.7%SCYB 4.6%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- HYG 0.81SCYB 0.82, better
- Worst fall
- HYG −15.8%SCYB −4.9%
- Market sensitivity
- HYG 0.67SCYB 0.28
HYG and SCYB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.49% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





