SCYB ranks 1st and HYGH 46th of 84 funds in the US High Yield Category.
HYGH vs SCYB
SCYB −0.49pt a year
0.52%0.03%
SCYB 18.4×the volume
60.2K1.1M
HYGH +0.3pt
+8.7%+8.4%
HYGH vs SCYB Performance
+4.6%+2.0%
- HYGH 0.52%
- SCYB 0.03%, better
- HYGH $641M
- SCYB $2.8B
- HYGH +4.6%, better
- SCYB +2.0%
- HYGH 6.53%
- SCYB 7.14%, better
- HYGH 1523
- SCYB 1844
- HYGH 60.2K sh
- SCYB 1.1M sh, better
- HYGH $84.87
- SCYB $25.22
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | HYGH | SCYB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D29 | A100Higher |
| Mission | B65 | A100Higher |
| Risk | B55 | B59Higher |
| Tradability | A82 | A88Higher |
| Holdings | B65 | A99Higher |
| Durability | A81Higher | B68 |
Rank among US High Yield funds
Same Category. HYGH and SCYB are both graded against the same 84 US High Yield funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
HYGHB
SCYBA
In short
HYGH High yield income with the rate risk engineered out: it owns iShares' flagship junk bond ETF and layers short interest rate swaps on top, leaving credit spreads as the main driver. A pure spread play, running since 2014.
SCYB Three basis points for the broad US high-yield corporate market. Schwab undercuts a category where the typical fund charges more than ten times as much, spreading the bet across roughly 1,800 bonds and paying monthly.
Stated mandate
HYGH The Fund seeks to track an index combining high-yield corporate-bond exposure with interest-rate hedges intended to reduce sensitivity to rising rates.
SCYB The fund follows a rules-based strategy intended to track the high-yield bond market, primarily through bonds in the Bloomberg Barclays US Corporate High Yield Total Return Index and similar derivatives.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
HYGH vs SCYB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
HYGH vs SCYB Cost
Overpaying HYGH vs SCYB
$9,713
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
HYGH 0.52%
$10,351
SCYB 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | HYGH | SCYB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $935 | $55 | $880 |
| 20 | $3,593 | $216 | $3,377 |
| 30 | $10,351 | $638 | $9,713 |
- 0.52%HYGH
- 0.03%SCYB, cheaper
- Middle half of US High Yield funds
- Median 0.42%
SCYB cheapest of 84 funds
HYGH 61st cheapest of 84 funds
HYGH vs SCYB Dividends
- HYGH 6.53%
- SCYB 7.14%, better
- HYGH $5.54
- SCYB $1.80
- HYGH $0.40
- SCYB $0.16
- HYGH Oct 2, 2026
- SCYB Oct 1, 2026
- HYGH Oct 7, 2026
- SCYB Oct 7, 2026
- HYGH Monthly
- SCYB Monthly
Distribution history
HYGH vs SCYB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- HYGH 3.0%, betterSCYB 4.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- HYGH 1.33, betterSCYB 0.82
- Worst fall
- HYGH −8.2%SCYB −4.9%
- Market sensitivity
- HYGH 0.20SCYB 0.28
HYGH and SCYB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.52% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.52% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.52% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
