SCYB ranks 1st and HYGV 16th of 84 funds in the US High Yield Category.
HYGV vs SCYB
SCYB −0.34pt a year
0.37%0.03%
SCYB 9.4×the volume
117K1.1M
SCYB +0.4pt
+8.0%+8.4%
HYGV vs SCYB Performance
+1.6%+2.0%
- HYGV 0.37%
- SCYB 0.03%, better
- HYGV $1.02B
- SCYB $2.8B
- HYGV +1.6%
- SCYB +2.0%, better
- HYGV 7.69%, better
- SCYB 7.14%
- HYGV 965
- SCYB 1844
- HYGV 117K sh
- SCYB 1.1M sh, better
- HYGV $38.51
- SCYB $25.22
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | HYGV | SCYB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B66 | A100Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C44 | B59Higher |
| Tradability | A71 | A88Higher |
| Holdings | A72 | A99Higher |
| Durability | A72Higher | B68 |
Rank among US High Yield funds
Same Category. HYGV and SCYB are both graded against the same 84 US High Yield funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
HYGVA
SCYBA
In short
HYGV Most high-yield ETFs buy the junk market by size. HYGV starts from the same universe, then reweights it toward Northern Trust's value score, with credit and liquidity screens on top. The quant tilt in a category built on plain beta.
SCYB Three basis points for the broad US high-yield corporate market. Schwab undercuts a category where the typical fund charges more than ten times as much, spreading the bet across roughly 1,800 bonds and paying monthly.
Stated mandate
HYGV The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Northern Trust High Yield Value-Scored US Corporate Bond Index.
SCYB The fund follows a rules-based strategy intended to track the high-yield bond market, primarily through bonds in the Bloomberg Barclays US Corporate High Yield Total Return Index and similar derivatives.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
HYGV vs SCYB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
HYGV vs SCYB Cost
Overpaying HYGV vs SCYB
$6,875
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
HYGV 0.37%
$7,513
SCYB 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | HYGV | SCYB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $670 | $55 | $615 |
| 20 | $2,590 | $216 | $2,374 |
| 30 | $7,513 | $638 | $6,875 |
- 0.37%HYGV
- 0.03%SCYB, cheaper
- Middle half of US High Yield funds
- Median 0.42%
SCYB cheapest of 84 funds
HYGV 29th cheapest of 84 funds
HYGV vs SCYB Dividends
- HYGV 7.69%, better
- SCYB 7.14%
- HYGV $2.97
- SCYB $1.80
- HYGV $0.26
- SCYB $0.16
- HYGV Oct 1, 2026
- SCYB Oct 1, 2026
- HYGV Oct 7, 2026
- SCYB Oct 7, 2026
- HYGV Monthly
- SCYB Monthly
Distribution history
HYGV vs SCYB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- HYGV 4.7%SCYB 4.6%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- HYGV 0.71SCYB 0.82, better
- Worst fall
- HYGV −17.1%SCYB −4.9%
- Market sensitivity
- HYGV 0.61SCYB 0.28
HYGV and SCYB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.37% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.37% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.37% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
