HYLB ranks 3rd and HYHG 73rd of 84 funds in the US High Yield Category.
HYHG vs HYLB
HYLB −0.45pt a year
0.50%0.05%
HYLB 24.0×the volume
50.9K1.22M
HYHG +2.9pt
+6.5%+3.6%
HYHG vs HYLB Performance
+37.2%+19.3%
- HYHG 0.50%
- HYLB 0.05%, better
- HYHG $240M
- HYLB $3.3B
- HYHG +3.6%, better
- HYLB +1.9%
- HYHG 6.81%, better
- HYLB 6.73%
- HYHG 234
- HYLB 1280
- HYHG 50.9K sh
- HYLB 1.22M sh, better
- HYHG $63.07
- HYLB $35.23
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | HYHG | HYLB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D35 | A98Higher |
| Mission | F0 | A100Higher |
| Risk | D39 | B59Higher |
| Tradability | C48 | A91Higher |
| Holdings | C44 | A88Higher |
| Durability | A75 | A77Higher |
Rank among US High Yield funds
Same Category. HYHG and HYLB are both graded against the same 84 US High Yield funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
HYHGD
HYLBA
In short
HYHG Most junk-bond ETFs hand you two risks: credit and interest rates. HYHG keeps the credit and shorts Treasury futures to target a duration of zero. A rare build, running since 2013, in a cohort of plain-vanilla high-yield trackers.
HYLB Broad-market junk bonds at index-fund pricing: 0.05% a year, a fraction of what the typical high-yield bond ETF charges, spread across roughly 1,300 issues. Running since 2016, it pays monthly.
Stated mandate
HYHG HYHG seeks to track the FTSE High Yield (Treasury Rate-Hedged) Index before fees and expenses. Its strategy combines high-yield corporate-bond exposure with short U.S. Treasury futures intended to reduce Treasury interest-rate sensitivity.
HYLB The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the Solactive USD High Yield Corporates Total Market Index. It uses a passive representative-sampling indexing approach.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
HYHG vs HYLB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
HYHG vs HYLB Cost
Overpaying HYHG vs HYLB
$8,919
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
HYHG 0.50%
$9,979
HYLB 0.05%
$1,060
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | HYHG | HYLB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $92 | $808 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $360 | $3,100 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $1,060 | $8,919 |
- 0.50%HYHG
- 0.05%HYLB, cheaper
- Middle half of US High Yield funds
- Median 0.42%
HYLB 2nd cheapest of 84 funds
HYHG 55th cheapest of 84 funds
HYHG vs HYLB Dividends
- HYHG 6.81%, better
- HYLB 6.73%
- HYHG $4.29
- HYLB $2.37
- HYHG $0.35
- HYLB $0.20
- HYHG Oct 1, 2026
- HYLB Oct 1, 2026
- HYHG Oct 7, 2026
- HYLB Oct 8, 2026
- HYHG Monthly
- HYLB Monthly
Distribution history
HYHG vs HYLB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- HYHG
- HYLB
Risk facts
- Volatility
- HYHG 4.1%, betterHYLB 4.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- HYHG 0.86, betterHYLB 0.82
- Worst fall
- HYHG −9.2%, betterHYLB −15.5%
- Market sensitivity
- HYHG 0.10HYLB 0.66
HYHG and HYLB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
