SCYB ranks 1st and HYHG 73rd of 84 funds in the US High Yield Category.
HYHG vs SCYB
SCYB −0.47pt a year
0.50%0.03%
SCYB 21.7×the volume
50.9K1.1M
SCYB +0.3pt
+8.1%+8.4%
HYHG vs SCYB Performance
+3.6%+2.0%
- HYHG 0.50%
- SCYB 0.03%, better
- HYHG $240M
- SCYB $2.8B
- HYHG +3.6%, better
- SCYB +2.0%
- HYHG 6.81%
- SCYB 7.14%, better
- HYHG 234
- SCYB 1844
- HYHG 50.9K sh
- SCYB 1.1M sh, better
- HYHG $63.07
- SCYB $25.22
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | HYHG | SCYB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D35 | A100Higher |
| Mission | F0 | A100Higher |
| Risk | D39 | B59Higher |
| Tradability | C48 | A88Higher |
| Holdings | C44 | A99Higher |
| Durability | A75Higher | B68 |
Rank among US High Yield funds
Same Category. HYHG and SCYB are both graded against the same 84 US High Yield funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
HYHGD
SCYBA
In short
HYHG Most junk-bond ETFs hand you two risks: credit and interest rates. HYHG keeps the credit and shorts Treasury futures to target a duration of zero. A rare build, running since 2013, in a cohort of plain-vanilla high-yield trackers.
SCYB Three basis points for the broad US high-yield corporate market. Schwab undercuts a category where the typical fund charges more than ten times as much, spreading the bet across roughly 1,800 bonds and paying monthly.
Stated mandate
HYHG HYHG seeks to track the FTSE High Yield (Treasury Rate-Hedged) Index before fees and expenses. Its strategy combines high-yield corporate-bond exposure with short U.S. Treasury futures intended to reduce Treasury interest-rate sensitivity.
SCYB The fund follows a rules-based strategy intended to track the high-yield bond market, primarily through bonds in the Bloomberg Barclays US Corporate High Yield Total Return Index and similar derivatives.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
HYHG vs SCYB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
HYHG vs SCYB Cost
Overpaying HYHG vs SCYB
$9,341
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
HYHG 0.50%
$9,979
SCYB 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | HYHG | SCYB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $55 | $845 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $216 | $3,244 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $638 | $9,341 |
- 0.50%HYHG
- 0.03%SCYB, cheaper
- Middle half of US High Yield funds
- Median 0.42%
SCYB cheapest of 84 funds
HYHG 55th cheapest of 84 funds
HYHG vs SCYB Dividends
- HYHG 6.81%
- SCYB 7.14%, better
- HYHG $4.29
- SCYB $1.80
- HYHG $0.35
- SCYB $0.16
- HYHG Oct 1, 2026
- SCYB Oct 1, 2026
- HYHG Oct 7, 2026
- SCYB Oct 7, 2026
- HYHG Monthly
- SCYB Monthly
Distribution history
HYHG vs SCYB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- HYHG 4.1%, betterSCYB 4.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- HYHG 0.86, betterSCYB 0.82
- Worst fall
- HYHG −9.2%SCYB −4.9%
- Market sensitivity
- HYHG 0.10SCYB 0.28
HYHG and SCYB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

