HYLB ranks 2nd and HYLS 51st of 84 funds in the US High Yield Category.
HYLB vs HYLS
HYLB −0.64pt a year
0.05%0.69%
HYLB 5.5×the volume
1.29M235K
HYLB +0.8pt
+3.5%+2.7%
HYLB vs HYLS Performance
+18.7%+14.4%
- HYLB 0.05%, better
- HYLS 0.69%
- HYLB $3.29B
- HYLS $1.62B
- HYLB +2.7%, better
- HYLS +1.9%
- HYLB 6.73%
- HYLS 6.80%, better
- HYLB 1285
- HYLS 362
- HYLB 1.29M sh, better
- HYLS 235K sh
- HYLB $35.09
- HYLS $39.85
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | HYLB | HYLS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A98Higher | F10 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A87 |
| Risk | C54Higher | C48 |
| Tradability | A92Higher | A80 |
| Holdings | A88Higher | B66 |
| Durability | A77 | A85Higher |
Rank among US High Yield funds
Same Category. HYLB and HYLS are both graded against the same 84 US High Yield funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
HYLBA
HYLSC
In short
HYLB Broad-market junk bonds at index-fund pricing: 0.05% a year, a fraction of what the typical high-yield bond ETF charges, spread across roughly 1,300 issues. Running since 2016, it pays monthly.
HYLS Most high yield ETFs buy the index and sit still. HYLS has been actively managed since 2013 and runs long and short bond positions at once, aiming at income first, appreciation second. That tactical wiring costs 0.69%, no fee waiver.
Stated mandate
HYLB The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the Solactive USD High Yield Corporates Total Market Index. It uses a passive representative-sampling indexing approach.
HYLS The Fund seeks current income and secondarily capital appreciation through active management. It normally invests at least 80% of net assets in below-investment-grade or comparably rated high-yield debt securities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
HYLB vs HYLS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
HYLB vs HYLS Cost
Overpaying HYLS vs HYLB
$12,369
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
HYLB 0.05%
$1,060
HYLS 0.69%
$13,429
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | HYLB | HYLS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $92 | $1,232 | $1,140 |
| 20 | $360 | $4,697 | $4,337 |
| 30 | $1,060 | $13,429 | $12,369 |
- 0.05%HYLB, cheaper
- 0.69%HYLS
- Middle half of US High Yield funds
- Median 0.42%
HYLB 2nd cheapest of 84 funds
HYLS 76th cheapest of 84 funds
HYLB vs HYLS Dividends
- HYLB 6.73%
- HYLS 6.80%, better
- HYLB $2.37
- HYLS $2.71
- HYLB $0.19
- HYLS $0.22
- HYLB Nov 2, 2026
- HYLS Oct 21, 2026
- HYLB Pays Nov 9, 2026
- HYLS Oct 30, 2026
- HYLB Monthly
- HYLS Monthly
Distribution history
HYLB vs HYLS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- HYLB
- HYLS
Risk facts
- Volatility
- HYLB 4.8%, betterHYLS 5.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- HYLB 0.82, betterHYLS 0.67
- Worst fall
- HYLB −15.5%, betterHYLS −15.8%
- Market sensitivity
- HYLB 0.66HYLS 0.67
Popular comparisons
- 0.05% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.