SCYB ranks 2nd and HYLS 51st of 84 funds in the US High Yield Category.
HYLS vs SCYB
SCYB −0.66pt a year
0.69%0.03%
SCYB 4.8×the volume
235K1.13M
SCYB +0.6pt
+6.9%+7.5%
HYLS vs SCYB Performance
+1.9%+2.5%
- HYLS 0.69%
- SCYB 0.03%, better
- HYLS $1.62B
- SCYB $2.74B
- HYLS +1.9%
- SCYB +2.5%, better
- HYLS 6.80%
- SCYB 7.17%, better
- HYLS 362
- SCYB 1839
- HYLS 235K sh
- SCYB 1.13M sh, better
- HYLS $39.85
- SCYB $25.21
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | HYLS | SCYB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F10 | A100Higher |
| Mission | A87 | A100Higher |
| Risk | C48 | B58Higher |
| Tradability | A80Higher | A77 |
| Holdings | B66 | A100Higher |
| Durability | A85Higher | B68 |
Rank among US High Yield funds
Same Category. HYLS and SCYB are both graded against the same 84 US High Yield funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
HYLSC
SCYBA
In short
HYLS Most high yield ETFs buy the index and sit still. HYLS has been actively managed since 2013 and runs long and short bond positions at once, aiming at income first, appreciation second. That tactical wiring costs 0.69%, no fee waiver.
SCYB Three basis points for the broad US high-yield corporate market. Schwab undercuts a category where the typical fund charges more than ten times as much, spreading the bet across roughly 1,800 bonds and paying monthly.
Stated mandate
HYLS The Fund seeks current income and secondarily capital appreciation through active management. It normally invests at least 80% of net assets in below-investment-grade or comparably rated high-yield debt securities.
SCYB The fund follows a rules-based strategy intended to track the high-yield bond market, primarily through bonds in the Bloomberg Barclays US Corporate High Yield Total Return Index and similar derivatives.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
HYLS vs SCYB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
HYLS vs SCYB Cost
Overpaying HYLS vs SCYB
$12,791
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
HYLS 0.69%
$13,429
SCYB 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | HYLS | SCYB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,232 | $55 | $1,177 |
| 20 | $4,697 | $216 | $4,481 |
| 30 | $13,429 | $638 | $12,791 |
- 0.69%HYLS
- 0.03%SCYB, cheaper
- Middle half of US High Yield funds
- Median 0.42%
SCYB cheapest of 84 funds
HYLS 76th cheapest of 84 funds
HYLS vs SCYB Dividends
- HYLS 6.80%
- SCYB 7.17%, better
- HYLS $2.71
- SCYB $1.81
- HYLS $0.22
- SCYB $0.16
- HYLS Oct 21, 2026
- SCYB Nov 2, 2026
- HYLS Oct 30, 2026
- SCYB Pays Nov 6, 2026
- HYLS Monthly
- SCYB Monthly
Distribution history
HYLS vs SCYB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- HYLS 5.0%SCYB 4.6%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- HYLS 0.67SCYB 0.82, better
- Worst fall
- HYLS −15.8%SCYB −4.9%
- Market sensitivity
- HYLS 0.67SCYB 0.28
HYLS and SCYB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.69% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
