Skip to content

HYLB vs MANI

Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF

HYLBANYSE Arca

Man Active Income ETF

MANIDNYSE Arca

Overlap

No data

Expense ratio

HYLB −0.80pt a year

HYLB0.05%MANI0.85%

Avg volume · 30D

HYLB 258.1×the volume

HYLB1.22MMANI4.73K

HYLB vs MANI Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+1.9%HYLB+8.7%MANI

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. HYLB +1.9%. MANI +8.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%4%6%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
HYLB 0.05%, better
MANI 0.85%
Fund size
HYLB $3.3B
MANI $25M
1Y total return
HYLB +1.9%
MANI +8.7%, better
Yield (12M)
HYLB 6.73%
MANI No data
Holdings
HYLB 1280
MANI 79
Avg volume (30D)
HYLB 1.22M sh, better
MANI 4.73K sh
NAV per share
HYLB $35.23
MANI $25.74
52W range

ETF.net Grade

HYLB: Cost 98, Risk 59, Mission 100, Tradability 91, Holdings 88, Durability 77. MANI: Cost 4, Risk 78, Mission 33, Tradability 17, Holdings 28, Durability 25.
Pillar letters and Scores for HYLB, MANI, with each pillar’s weight
PillarHYLBMANI
Cost30% weightA98HigherF4
Mission25% weightA100HigherD33
Risk15% weightB59A78Higher
Tradability15% weightA91HigherF17
Holdings10% weightA88HigherD28
Durability5% weightA77HigherD25

Rank among US High Yield funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. HYLB and MANI are both graded against the same 84 US High Yield funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US High Yield⁠

Category · 84 funds
See all 84 ›

HYLB ranks 3rd and MANI 75th of 84 funds in the US High Yield Category.

  1. Rank 1ASCYBSchwab High Yield Bond ETFScore 90
  2. Rank 1ASPHYState Street SPDR Portfolio High Yield Bond ETFScore 90
  3. Rank 3AHYLBXtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETFScore 89
  4. Rank 4AUSHYiShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETFScore 88
  5. Rank 75DHYBXTCW High Yield Bond ETFScore 27
  6. Rank 75DMANIMan Active Income ETFScore 27
  7. Rank 75DMUSETCW Multisector Credit Income ETFScore 27

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

HYLBAXtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF

MANIDMan Active Income ETF

In short

HYLB Broad-market junk bonds at index-fund pricing: 0.05% a year, a fraction of what the typical high-yield bond ETF charges, spread across roughly 1,300 issues. Running since 2016, it pays monthly.

MANI An income-first bond fund that runs on a manager's credit calls, not an index. Launched in 2025 into a high yield aisle dominated by ultra-cheap trackers, it is the active alternative, and priced like one.

Stated mandate

HYLB The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the Solactive USD High Yield Corporates Total Market Index. It uses a passive representative-sampling indexing approach.

MANI The Fund seeks current income, while capital growth is secondary.

Why people hold it

  • HYLB 0.05% expense ratio puts it at the low end of the high-yield ETF field, matching SPHY and undercutting USHY's 0.08%. Fee drag matters most where yield is the whole point.
  • Total-market mandate, not a filtered slice: roughly 1,300 bonds sampled from the Solactive USD High Yield Corporates Total Market Index.
  • Tracking has been tight against its stated index, and it trades actively enough to keep spreads workable. One of the cleaner implementations in the high-yield group.
  • Monthly distributions, with a live record going back to a 2016 launch (through the 2020 credit shock and the 2022 rate spike).
  • MANI Actively run with a clear hierarchy: current income first, capital growth second. No index to shadow, so the manager can move around the credit market.
  • Pays income quarterly, with the prospectus committing to distributions at least annually.
  • Plain 1940 Act fund structure: ordinary 1099 tax reporting, no K-1 to wait on.
  • Its price swings so far sit among the steadier in the high yield group, though that read comes from a short history.

Worth knowing

  • HYLB This is the credit-risk end of the bond market. Below-investment-grade issuers default more often, and prices can fall hard when spreads widen.
  • Representative sampling means it holds a subset of the index, not every bond, so results can drift slightly from the benchmark.
  • Cheap, but not the floor: SCYB runs 0.03%. HYLB is also a mid-sized fund next to the largest names in the category.
  • MANI The fee is 0.85% a year, roughly double the typical high yield ETF, and index heavyweights like SPHY, USHY and SCYB charge a small fraction of that.
  • A 2025 launch that is still small and thinly traded, so bid-ask spreads can be wide and every order moves a bigger share of the day's volume.
  • Nothing here is on autopilot. Results hang on the manager's credit selection, and the fund has not yet seen a full credit cycle.

Full HYLB profile⁠

Full MANI profile⁠

HYLB vs MANI Holdings

How HYLB and MANI differ

No overlap figure

Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues.

Level by level

  • Countryby domicile54.3%
  • Asset classFixed Income100%

Sector

No Sector split for HYLB and MANI.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in HYLB and MANI, widest gap first
CountryMore in HYLBMore in MANI
United StatesHYLB +40.9 points
Cayman IslandsMANI +9.6 points
GermanyMANI +6.7 points
SwedenMANI +6.4 points
ItalyMANI +4.0 points
SingaporeMANI +3.6 points
United KingdomMANI +3.1 points
LuxembourgMANI +2.9 points
Other countries (15)MANI +4.6 points

Outside the US: MANI 70% developed, 30% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • HYLB5.5%
  • MANI35.7%

Securities held

  • HYLB1,269
  • MANI75

Asset class

HYLB
Fixed Income
MANI
Fixed Income

Holdings

Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues, so this page lists no shared Holdings. HYLB holds 1,269 securities, MANI 75.

All 1,295 HYLB holdings⁠All MANI holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

HYLB vs MANI Cost

Overpaying MANI vs HYLB

$15,139

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • HYLB 0.05%

    $1,060

  • MANI 0.85%

    $16,199

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • HYLB 0.05%
  • MANI 0.85%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530MANI $16,199HYLB $1,060

Year by year

YearHYLBMANIOverpaying
10$92$1,508$1,416
20$360$5,706$5,346
30$1,060$16,199$15,139

Expense ratio

  • 0.05%HYLB, cheaper
  • 0.85%MANI
  • Middle half of US High Yield funds
  • Median 0.42%

HYLB 2nd cheapest of 84 funds

MANI 81st cheapest of 84 funds

HYLB vs MANI Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
HYLB 6.73%
MANI No data
Payout (12M)
HYLB $2.37
MANI No data
Last payment
HYLB $0.20
MANI $0.44
Ex-dividend
HYLB Oct 1, 2026
MANI Sep 24, 2026
Paid on
HYLB Oct 8, 2026
MANI Sep 30, 2026
Frequency
HYLB Monthly
MANI Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

HYLBMonthly · 45 paymentsAll HYLB payments⁠
One bar per payment. 45 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Feb 1, 2023 $0.18; Mar 1, 2023 $0.16; Apr 3, 2023 $0.17; May 1, 2023 $0.16; Jun 1, 2023 $0.18; Jul 3, 2023 $0.17; Aug 1, 2023 $0.18; Sep 1, 2023 $0.18; Oct 2, 2023 $0.18; Nov 1, 2023 $0.18; Dec 1, 2023 $0.17; Dec 21, 2023 $0.17; Feb 1, 2024 $0.18; Mar 1, 2024 $0.17; Apr 1, 2024 $0.20; May 1, 2024 $0.18; Jun 3, 2024 $0.18; Jul 1, 2024 $0.18; Aug 1, 2024 $0.19; Sep 3, 2024 $0.19; Oct 1, 2024 $0.19; Nov 1, 2024 $0.19; Dec 2, 2024 $0.19; Dec 23, 2024 $0.22; Feb 3, 2025 $0.20; Mar 3, 2025 $0.18; Apr 1, 2025 $0.18; May 1, 2025 $0.19; Jun 2, 2025 $0.20; Jul 1, 2025 $0.19; Aug 1, 2025 $0.20; Sep 2, 2025 $0.20; Oct 1, 2025 $0.19; Nov 3, 2025 $0.20; Dec 1, 2025 $0.19; Dec 22, 2025 $0.21; Feb 2, 2026 $0.21; Mar 2, 2026 $0.17; Apr 1, 2026 $0.22; May 1, 2026 $0.19; Jun 1, 2026 $0.20; Jul 1, 2026 $0.19; Aug 3, 2026 $0.20; Sep 1, 2026 $0.19; Oct 1, 2026 $0.20. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD
MANIQuarterly · 4 paymentsAll MANI payments⁠
One bar per payment. 4 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 16, 2025 $0.75; Mar 25, 2026 $0.07; Jun 24, 2026 $0.38; Sep 24, 2026 $0.44. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD

HYLB vs MANI Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
HYLB 4.8%MANI 1.7%since Oct 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
HYLB 0.82MANI 2.67since Oct 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
HYLB −15.5%MANI −1.1%since Sep 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
HYLB 0.66MANI 0.18

Popular comparisons

  • HYLBAvsSCYBA

    Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF · Schwab High Yield Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.05% · 0.03%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MANIDvsSCYBA

    Man Active Income ETF · Schwab High Yield Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.03%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • HYLBAvsSPHYA

    Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF · State Street SPDR Portfolio High Yield Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.05% · 0.05%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MANIDvsSPHYA

    Man Active Income ETF · State Street SPDR Portfolio High Yield Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.05%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • HYLBAvsUSHYA

    Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF · iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.05% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MANIDvsUSHYA

    Man Active Income ETF · iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.