SCYB ranks 1st and MANI 75th of 84 funds in the US High Yield Category.
MANI vs SCYB
SCYB −0.82pt a year
0.85%0.03%
SCYB 233.7×the volume
4.73K1.1M
MANI vs SCYB Performance
+8.7%+2.0%
- MANI 0.85%
- SCYB 0.03%, better
- MANI $25M
- SCYB $2.8B
- MANI +8.7%, better
- SCYB +2.0%
- MANI
- SCYB 7.14%
- MANI 79
- SCYB 1844
- MANI 4.73K sh
- SCYB 1.1M sh, better
- MANI $25.74
- SCYB $25.22
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | MANI | SCYB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F4 | A100Higher |
| Mission | D33 | A100Higher |
| Risk | A78Higher | B59 |
| Tradability | F17 | A88Higher |
| Holdings | D28 | A99Higher |
| Durability | D25 | B68Higher |
Rank among US High Yield funds
Same Category. MANI and SCYB are both graded against the same 84 US High Yield funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
MANID
SCYBA
In short
MANI An income-first bond fund that runs on a manager's credit calls, not an index. Launched in 2025 into a high yield aisle dominated by ultra-cheap trackers, it is the active alternative, and priced like one.
SCYB Three basis points for the broad US high-yield corporate market. Schwab undercuts a category where the typical fund charges more than ten times as much, spreading the bet across roughly 1,800 bonds and paying monthly.
Stated mandate
MANI The Fund seeks current income, while capital growth is secondary.
SCYB The fund follows a rules-based strategy intended to track the high-yield bond market, primarily through bonds in the Bloomberg Barclays US Corporate High Yield Total Return Index and similar derivatives.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
MANI vs SCYB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
MANI vs SCYB Cost
Overpaying MANI vs SCYB
$15,561
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
MANI 0.85%
$16,199
SCYB 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | MANI | SCYB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,508 | $55 | $1,453 |
| 20 | $5,706 | $216 | $5,490 |
| 30 | $16,199 | $638 | $15,561 |
- 0.85%MANI
- 0.03%SCYB, cheaper
- Middle half of US High Yield funds
- Median 0.42%
SCYB cheapest of 84 funds
MANI 81st cheapest of 84 funds
MANI vs SCYB Dividends
- MANI
- SCYB 7.14%
- MANI
- SCYB $1.80
- MANI $0.44
- SCYB $0.16
- MANI Sep 24, 2026
- SCYB Oct 1, 2026
- MANI Sep 30, 2026
- SCYB Oct 7, 2026
- MANI Quarterly
- SCYB Monthly
Distribution history
MANI vs SCYB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- MANI 1.7%SCYB 4.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- MANI 2.67SCYB 0.82
- Worst fall
- MANI −1.1%SCYB −4.9%
- Market sensitivity
- MANI 0.18SCYB 0.28
MANI and SCYB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.85% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
