SCYB ranks 1st and BHYB 5th of 84 funds in the US High Yield Category.
BHYB vs SCYB
SCYB −0.17pt a year
0.20%0.03%
SCYB 6.9×the volume
160K1.1M
SCYB +0.3pt
+8.1%+8.4%
BHYB vs SCYB Performance
+2.5%+2.0%
- BHYB 0.20%
- SCYB 0.03%, better
- BHYB $3.06B
- SCYB $2.8B
- BHYB +2.5%, better
- SCYB +2.0%
- BHYB 6.38%
- SCYB 7.14%, better
- BHYB 1463
- SCYB 1844
- BHYB 160K sh
- SCYB 1.1M sh, better
- BHYB $52.61
- SCYB $25.22
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BHYB | SCYB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A87 | A100Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | B64Higher | B59 |
| Tradability | A79 | A88Higher |
| Holdings | A92 | A99Higher |
| Durability | B69Higher | B68 |
Rank among US High Yield funds
Same Category. BHYB and SCYB are both graded against the same 84 US High Yield funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BHYBA
SCYBA
In short
BHYB High yield with two filters bolted on: no CCC-rated bonds, no financial issuers. You get the BB and B middle of the junk market, at 0.20% a year, half the typical cost in its category.
SCYB Three basis points for the broad US high-yield corporate market. Schwab undercuts a category where the typical fund charges more than ten times as much, spreading the bet across roughly 1,800 bonds and paying monthly.
Stated mandate
BHYB The fund uses a passive representative-sampling strategy to track its Underlying Index, investing primarily in U.S.-dollar-denominated below-investment-grade corporate bonds that meet the index's BB-to-B credit-rating range and exclude financial issuers.
SCYB The fund follows a rules-based strategy intended to track the high-yield bond market, primarily through bonds in the Bloomberg Barclays US Corporate High Yield Total Return Index and similar derivatives.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BHYB vs SCYB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BHYB vs SCYB Cost
Overpaying BHYB vs SCYB
$3,517
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BHYB 0.20%
$4,155
SCYB 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BHYB | SCYB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $365 | $55 | $310 |
| 20 | $1,421 | $216 | $1,205 |
| 30 | $4,155 | $638 | $3,517 |
- 0.20%BHYB
- 0.03%SCYB, cheaper
- Middle half of US High Yield funds
- Median 0.42%
SCYB cheapest of 84 funds
BHYB 10th cheapest of 84 funds
BHYB vs SCYB Dividends
- BHYB 6.38%
- SCYB 7.14%, better
- BHYB $3.36
- SCYB $1.80
- BHYB $0.28
- SCYB $0.16
- BHYB Oct 1, 2026
- SCYB Oct 1, 2026
- BHYB Oct 8, 2026
- SCYB Oct 7, 2026
- BHYB Monthly
- SCYB Monthly
Distribution history
BHYB vs SCYB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BHYB 4.3%, betterSCYB 4.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- BHYB 0.81SCYB 0.82, better
- Worst fall
- BHYB −4.2%SCYB −4.9%
- Market sensitivity
- BHYB 0.27SCYB 0.28
BHYB and SCYB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.20% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
