SCYB ranks 1st and HYS 42nd of 84 funds in the US High Yield Category.
HYS vs SCYB
SCYB −0.52pt a year
0.55%0.03%
SCYB 10.1×the volume
112K1.14M
SCYB +0.3pt
+7.6%+7.9%
HYS vs SCYB Performance
+2.2%+2.6%
- HYS 0.55%
- SCYB 0.03%, better
- HYS $1.68B
- SCYB $2.73B
- HYS +2.2%
- SCYB +2.6%, better
- HYS 7.53%, better
- SCYB 7.16%
- HYS 823
- SCYB 1838
- HYS 112K sh
- SCYB 1.14M sh, better
- HYS $89.67
- SCYB $25.18
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | HYS | SCYB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F21 | A100Higher |
| Mission | A95 | A100Higher |
| Risk | B57 | B60Higher |
| Tradability | A83Higher | A79 |
| Holdings | C46 | A99Higher |
| Durability | A83Higher | B68 |
Rank among US High Yield funds
Same Category. HYS and SCYB are both graded against the same 84 US High Yield funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
HYSB
SCYBA
In short
HYS Most junk-bond ETFs buy the whole market. HYS buys only the front end: US high-yield corporate bonds maturing inside five years, which dials down interest-rate sensitivity while keeping the credit exposure. PIMCO has run it since 2011.
SCYB Three basis points for the broad US high-yield corporate market. Schwab undercuts a category where the typical fund charges more than ten times as much, spreading the bet across roughly 1,800 bonds and paying monthly.
Stated mandate
HYS The Fund seeks total return that closely tracks the ICE BofA 0-5 Year US High Yield Constrained Index before fees and expenses, using an indexing and representative-sampling approach.
SCYB The fund follows a rules-based strategy intended to track the high-yield bond market, primarily through bonds in the Bloomberg Barclays US Corporate High Yield Total Return Index and similar derivatives.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
HYS vs SCYB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
HYS vs SCYB Cost
Overpaying HYS vs SCYB
$10,266
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
HYS 0.55%
$10,904
SCYB 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | HYS | SCYB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $988 | $55 | $933 |
| 20 | $3,790 | $216 | $3,574 |
| 30 | $10,904 | $638 | $10,266 |
- 0.55%HYS
- 0.03%SCYB, cheaper
- Middle half of US High Yield funds
- Median 0.42%
SCYB cheapest of 84 funds
HYS 64th cheapest of 84 funds
HYS vs SCYB Dividends
- HYS 7.53%, better
- SCYB 7.16%
- HYS $6.77
- SCYB $1.81
- HYS $0.55
- SCYB $0.16
- HYS Nov 2, 2026
- SCYB Nov 2, 2026
- HYS Nov 4, 2026
- SCYB Nov 6, 2026
- HYS Monthly
- SCYB Monthly
Distribution history
HYS vs SCYB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- HYS 3.9%, betterSCYB 4.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- HYS 0.86, betterSCYB 0.82
- Worst fall
- HYS −10.6%SCYB −4.9%
- Market sensitivity
- HYS 0.47SCYB 0.28
HYS and SCYB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.55% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
