SCYB ranks 1st and HYSA 70th of 84 funds in the US High Yield Category.
HYSA vs SCYB
SCYB −0.52pt a year
0.55%0.03%
SCYB 14.5×the volume
75.9K1.1M
SCYB +0.6pt
+7.8%+8.4%
HYSA vs SCYB Performance
+1.0%+2.0%
- HYSA 0.55%
- SCYB 0.03%, better
- HYSA $111M
- SCYB $2.8B
- HYSA +1.0%
- SCYB +2.0%, better
- HYSA 6.79%
- SCYB 7.14%, better
- HYSA 6
- SCYB 1844
- HYSA 75.9K sh
- SCYB 1.1M sh, better
- HYSA $14.42
- SCYB $25.22
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | HYSA | SCYB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F21 | A100Higher |
| Mission | C51 | A100Higher |
| Risk | D36 | B59Higher |
| Tradability | D36 | A88Higher |
| Holdings | F24 | A99Higher |
| Durability | C43 | B68Higher |
Rank among US High Yield funds
Same Category. HYSA and SCYB are both graded against the same 84 US High Yield funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
HYSAD
SCYBA
In short
HYSA Most high-yield ETFs buy the whole junk market and sit still. HYSA is an active call on which slice to own, rotating across BB, B and CCC rated credit through BondBloxx's own ratings-sliced bond ETFs.
SCYB Three basis points for the broad US high-yield corporate market. Schwab undercuts a category where the typical fund charges more than ten times as much, spreading the bet across roughly 1,800 bonds and paying monthly.
Stated mandate
HYSA Seeks to primarily invest in U.S. dollar-denominated, high-yield corporate bonds across multiple fixed-income sectors by investing in other ETFs (a fund-of-funds, actively managed, sector-rotation approach).
SCYB The fund follows a rules-based strategy intended to track the high-yield bond market, primarily through bonds in the Bloomberg Barclays US Corporate High Yield Total Return Index and similar derivatives.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
HYSA vs SCYB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
HYSA vs SCYB Cost
Overpaying HYSA vs SCYB
$10,266
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
HYSA 0.55%
$10,904
SCYB 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | HYSA | SCYB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $988 | $55 | $933 |
| 20 | $3,790 | $216 | $3,574 |
| 30 | $10,904 | $638 | $10,266 |
- 0.55%HYSA
- 0.03%SCYB, cheaper
- Middle half of US High Yield funds
- Median 0.42%
SCYB cheapest of 84 funds
HYSA 64th cheapest of 84 funds
HYSA vs SCYB Dividends
- HYSA 6.79%
- SCYB 7.14%, better
- HYSA $0.98
- SCYB $1.80
- HYSA $0.07
- SCYB $0.16
- HYSA Oct 1, 2026
- SCYB Oct 1, 2026
- HYSA Oct 6, 2026
- SCYB Oct 7, 2026
- HYSA Monthly
- SCYB Monthly
Distribution history
HYSA vs SCYB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- HYSA 4.8%SCYB 4.6%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- HYSA 0.68SCYB 0.82, better
- Worst fall
- HYSA −4.9%SCYB −4.9%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Market sensitivity
- HYSA 0.20SCYB 0.28
HYSA and SCYB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.55% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
