SCYB ranks 1st and HYUP 20th of 84 funds in the US High Yield Category.
HYUP vs SCYB
SCYB −0.17pt a year
0.20%0.03%
SCYB 184.6×the volume
5.98K1.1M
HYUP +0.6pt
+9.0%+8.4%
HYUP vs SCYB Performance
+0.4%+2.0%
- HYUP 0.20%
- SCYB 0.03%, better
- HYUP $43M
- SCYB $2.8B
- HYUP +0.4%
- SCYB +2.0%, better
- HYUP 7.81%, better
- SCYB 7.14%
- HYUP 709
- SCYB 1844
- HYUP 5.98K sh
- SCYB 1.1M sh, better
- HYUP $39.41
- SCYB $25.22
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | HYUP | SCYB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A87 | A100Higher |
| Mission | A99 | A100Higher |
| Risk | D32 | B59Higher |
| Tradability | D33 | A88Higher |
| Holdings | A76 | A99Higher |
| Durability | C54 | B68Higher |
Rank among US High Yield funds
Same Category. HYUP and SCYB are both graded against the same 84 US High Yield funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
HYUPB
SCYBA
In short
HYUP Most high-yield ETFs hand you the whole junk market. HYUP goes hunting in the loud end of it: a passive index built around the higher-beta slice of USD high yield, priced at half the fee of the typical peer.
SCYB Three basis points for the broad US high-yield corporate market. Schwab undercuts a category where the typical fund charges more than ten times as much, spreading the bet across roughly 1,800 bonds and paying monthly.
Stated mandate
HYUP The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the Solactive USD High Yield Corporates Total Market High Beta Index through a passive indexing approach.
SCYB The fund follows a rules-based strategy intended to track the high-yield bond market, primarily through bonds in the Bloomberg Barclays US Corporate High Yield Total Return Index and similar derivatives.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
HYUP vs SCYB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
HYUP vs SCYB Cost
Overpaying HYUP vs SCYB
$3,517
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
HYUP 0.20%
$4,155
SCYB 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | HYUP | SCYB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $365 | $55 | $310 |
| 20 | $1,421 | $216 | $1,205 |
| 30 | $4,155 | $638 | $3,517 |
- 0.20%HYUP
- 0.03%SCYB, cheaper
- Middle half of US High Yield funds
- Median 0.42%
SCYB cheapest of 84 funds
HYUP 10th cheapest of 84 funds
HYUP vs SCYB Dividends
- HYUP 7.81%, better
- SCYB 7.14%
- HYUP $3.08
- SCYB $1.80
- HYUP $0.27
- SCYB $0.16
- HYUP Oct 1, 2026
- SCYB Oct 1, 2026
- HYUP Oct 8, 2026
- SCYB Oct 7, 2026
- HYUP Monthly
- SCYB Monthly
Distribution history
HYUP vs SCYB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- HYUP 5.6%SCYB 4.6%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- HYUP 0.80SCYB 0.82, better
- Worst fall
- HYUP −18.1%SCYB −4.9%
- Market sensitivity
- HYUP 0.72SCYB 0.28
HYUP and SCYB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.20% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
