XLF ranks 1st and IAK 9th of 18 funds in the Financials (Broad) Category.
IAK vs XLF
XLF −0.29pt a year
0.37%0.08%
XLF 276.5×the volume
122K33.7M
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
+12.8%+12.8%
IAK vs XLF Performance
+97.1%+57.8%
- IAK 0.37%
- XLF 0.08%, better
- IAK $483M
- XLF $53.4B
- IAK +17.8%, better
- XLF +11.6%
- IAK 2.38%, better
- XLF 1.42%
- IAK 63
- XLF 79
- IAK 122K sh
- XLF 33.7M sh, better
- IAK $148.58
- XLF $57.16
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IAK | XLF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C53 | A97Higher |
| Mission | A78 | A85Higher |
| Risk | B67Higher | B57 |
| Tradability | B56 | A100Higher |
| Holdings | F11 | C42Higher |
| Durability | B64 | A81Higher |
Rank among Financials (Broad) funds
Same Category. IAK and XLF are both graded against the same 18 Financials (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IAKB
XLFA
In short
IAK Financials, minus the banks. IAK tracks a market-cap index of U.S. insurers (life, property-casualty, brokers) in roughly 60 names, and it has run that same pure-play mandate since 2006.
XLF The 1998 original. XLF holds the S&P 500's financial sector, roughly 80 banks, insurers, card networks and exchanges, for 0.08% a year. Not the whole sector, the blue-chip end of it, and one of the most heavily traded ways to own it.
Stated mandate
IAK The fund pursues the results of an index of U.S. insurance-sector equities. It uses representative-sampling indexing rather than active management and generally places at least 80% of assets in index components.
XLF The fund seeks to track, before expenses, the price and yield performance of the Financial Select Sector Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IAK vs XLF Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IAK vs XLF Cost
Overpaying IAK vs XLF
$5,824
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IAK 0.37%
$7,513
XLF 0.08%
$1,689
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IAK | XLF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $670 | $147 | $523 |
| 20 | $2,590 | $575 | $2,015 |
| 30 | $7,513 | $1,689 | $5,824 |
- 0.37%IAK
- 0.08%XLF, cheaper
- Middle half of Financials (Broad) funds
- Median 0.37%
XLF cheapest of 18 funds
IAK 7th cheapest of 18 funds
IAK vs XLF Dividends
- IAK 2.38%, better
- XLF 1.42%
- IAK $3.57
- XLF $0.83
- IAK $0.51
- XLF $0.20
- IAK Sep 15, 2026
- XLF Sep 21, 2026
- IAK Sep 18, 2026
- XLF Sep 23, 2026
- IAK Quarterly
- XLF Quarterly
Distribution history
IAK vs XLF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- IAK
- XLF
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IAK 16.9%XLF 15.0%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- IAK 0.85XLF 1.13, better
- Worst fall
- IAK −14.7%, betterXLF −25.8%
- Market sensitivity
- IAK 0.35XLF 0.75
IAK and XLF in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.37% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.37% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.37% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





