TBJL ranks 3rd and IBFR 7th of 9 funds in the Other Buffered Category.
IBFR vs TBJL
TBJL −0.06pt a year
0.85%0.79%
TBJL 2.1×the volume
1.44K3.06K
IBFR vs TBJL Performance
−2.4%+0.8%
- IBFR 0.85%
- TBJL 0.79%, better
- IBFR $20M
- TBJL $9M
- IBFR
- TBJL −5.0%
- IBFR 316
- TBJL 3
- IBFR 1.44K sh
- TBJL 3.06K sh, better
- IBFR $49.34
- TBJL $19.17
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IBFR | TBJL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D39 | A75Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C41 | C41 |
| Tradability | D34 | D36Higher |
| Holdings | A70 | |
| Durability | C40 | B64Higher |
Rank among Other Buffered funds
Same Category. IBFR and TBJL are both graded against the same 9 Other Buffered funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IBFRC
TBJLB
In short
IBFR Most buffer funds pay for downside protection with a ceiling on gains. Innovator's Managed 10 flips the deal: a roughly 10% loss buffer on developed-market stocks outside the US and Canada, with the upside left uncapped.
TBJL Buffer ETFs almost always wrap the S&P 500. This one wraps long-dated Treasuries, absorbing the first 9% of a 12-month price decline in exchange for a cap that resets every July. Duration risk with guardrails.
Stated mandate
IBFR The Fund seeks capital appreciation from uncapped participation in large- and mid-cap developed-market equities outside the United States and Canada, while limiting losses through its hedging strategy.
TBJL The fund seeks to track the price return of the iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT), subject to a 52.27% upside cap and protection against the first 9% of losses during the stated annual outcome period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IBFR vs TBJL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IBFR vs TBJL Cost
Overpaying IBFR vs TBJL
$1,025
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IBFR 0.85%
$16,199
TBJL 0.79%
$15,174
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IBFR | TBJL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,508 | $1,405 | $103 |
| 20 | $5,706 | $5,331 | $375 |
| 30 | $16,199 | $15,174 | $1,025 |
- 0.85%IBFR
- 0.79%TBJL, cheaper
- Middle half of Other Buffered funds
- Median 0.85%
TBJL cheapest of 9 funds
IBFR 3rd cheapest of 9 funds
IBFR vs TBJL Dividends
- IBFR
- TBJL None
- IBFR $0.06
- TBJL
- IBFR Sep 30, 2026
- TBJL
- IBFR Oct 2, 2026
- TBJL
- IBFR Quarterly
- TBJL
Distribution history
IBFR vs TBJL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IBFR TBJL 9.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- IBFR TBJL −0.19
- Worst fall
- IBFR TBJL −28.6%
- Market sensitivity
- IBFR 0.29TBJL 0.41
Popular comparisons
- 0.85% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.