TBJL ranks 2nd and RSJN 4th of 9 funds in the Other Buffered Category.
RSJN vs TBJL
TBJL −0.06pt a year
0.85%0.79%
RSJN 2.3×the volume
28.4K12.2K
RSJN vs TBJL Performance
+13.5%−6.0%
- RSJN 0.85%
- TBJL 0.79%, better
- RSJN $86M
- TBJL $9M
- RSJN +13.5%, better
- TBJL −6.0%
- RSJN 3
- TBJL 3
- RSJN 28.4K sh, better
- TBJL 12.2K sh
- RSJN $38.13
- TBJL $19.10
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | RSJN | TBJL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D39 | A75Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A79Higher | C40 |
| Tradability | B65Higher | C50 |
| Holdings | B57 | |
| Durability | A84Higher | B61 |
Rank among Other Buffered funds
Same Category. RSJN and TBJL are both graded against the same 9 Other Buffered funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
RSJNB
TBJLB
In short
RSJN Most buffer ETFs are bolted onto the cap-weighted S&P 500, where a few megacaps call the shots. RSJN buffers the equal-weight version instead: the same 500-odd names, spread evenly, with the first 10% of losses absorbed over each June-to-June period.
TBJL Buffer ETFs almost always wrap the S&P 500. This one wraps long-dated Treasuries, absorbing the first 9% of a 12-month price decline in exchange for a cap that resets every July. Duration risk with guardrails.
Stated mandate
RSJN Seeks returns matching the Underlying ETF’s price return up to a predetermined cap, while buffering the first 10% of its losses during the June 22, 2026–June 17, 2027 Target Outcome Period.
TBJL The fund seeks to track the price return of the iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT), subject to a 52.27% upside cap and protection against the first 9% of losses during the stated annual outcome period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
RSJN vs TBJL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
RSJN vs TBJL Cost
Overpaying RSJN vs TBJL
$1,025
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
RSJN 0.85%
$16,199
TBJL 0.79%
$15,174
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | RSJN | TBJL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,508 | $1,405 | $103 |
| 20 | $5,706 | $5,331 | $375 |
| 30 | $16,199 | $15,174 | $1,025 |
- 0.85%RSJN
- 0.79%TBJL, cheaper
- Middle half of Other Buffered funds
- Median 0.85%
TBJL cheapest of 9 funds
RSJN 3rd cheapest of 9 funds
RSJN vs TBJL Dividends
- RSJN None
- TBJL None
Distribution history
RSJN vs TBJL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- RSJN 7.4%TBJL 9.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- RSJN 0.84TBJL −0.19
- Worst fall
- RSJN −12.4%TBJL −28.6%
- Market sensitivity
- RSJN 0.49TBJL 0.41
Popular comparisons
- 0.85% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.