Skip to content

RSJN vs TBJL

FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - June

RSJNBNYSE Arca

Innovator 20+ Year Treasury Bond 9 Buffer ETF - July

TBJLBCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

TBJL −0.06pt a year

RSJN0.85%TBJL0.79%

Avg volume · 30D

RSJN 2.3×the volume

RSJN28.4KTBJL12.2K

RSJN vs TBJL Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+13.5%RSJN−6.0%TBJL

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. RSJN +13.5%. TBJL −6.0%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−10%0%5%10%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
RSJN 0.85%
TBJL 0.79%, better
Fund size
RSJN $86M
TBJL $9M
1Y total return
RSJN +13.5%, better
TBJL −6.0%
Holdings
RSJN 3
TBJL 3
Avg volume (30D)
RSJN 28.4K sh, better
TBJL 12.2K sh
NAV per share
RSJN $38.13
TBJL $19.10
52W range

ETF.net Grade

RSJN: Cost 39, Risk 79, Mission not scored, Tradability 65, Holdings 57, Durability 84. TBJL: Cost 75, Risk 40, Mission not scored, Tradability 50, Holdings not scored, Durability 61.
Pillar letters and Scores for RSJN, TBJL, with each pillar’s weight
PillarRSJNTBJL
Cost30% weightD39A75Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA79HigherC40
Tradability15% weightB65HigherC50
Holdings10% weightB57Not scored
Durability5% weightA84HigherB61

Rank among Other Buffered funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. RSJN and TBJL are both graded against the same 9 Other Buffered funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Other Buffered⁠

Category · 9 funds
See all 9 ›

TBJL ranks 2nd and RSJN 4th of 9 funds in the Other Buffered Category.

  1. Rank 1BKBFRInnovator U.S. Small Cap Managed 10 Buffer ETFScore 63
  2. Rank 2BTBJLInnovator 20+ Year Treasury Bond 9 Buffer ETF - JulyScore 60
  3. Rank 3BIBUFInnovator International Developed 10 Buffer ETFScore 58
  4. Rank 4BRSJNFT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - JuneScore 57
  5. Rank 5CRSMRFT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - MarchScore 53

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

RSJNBFT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - June

TBJLBInnovator 20+ Year Treasury Bond 9 Buffer ETF - July

In short

RSJN Most buffer ETFs are bolted onto the cap-weighted S&P 500, where a few megacaps call the shots. RSJN buffers the equal-weight version instead: the same 500-odd names, spread evenly, with the first 10% of losses absorbed over each June-to-June period.

TBJL Buffer ETFs almost always wrap the S&P 500. This one wraps long-dated Treasuries, absorbing the first 9% of a 12-month price decline in exchange for a cap that resets every July. Duration risk with guardrails.

Stated mandate

RSJN Seeks returns matching the Underlying ETF’s price return up to a predetermined cap, while buffering the first 10% of its losses during the June 22, 2026–June 17, 2027 Target Outcome Period.

TBJL The fund seeks to track the price return of the iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT), subject to a 52.27% upside cap and protection against the first 9% of losses during the stated annual outcome period.

Why people hold it

  • RSJN The reference asset is the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF, so roughly 500 companies carry similar weight and no single megacap steers the outcome. A rare flavor in a cohort built mostly on cap-weighted indexes.ftportfolios.com
  • The rules are written down, not left to a manager's judgment: absorb the first 10% of the underlying ETF's price decline over the stated outcome period, in exchange for an upside cap set at each period's start.ftportfolios.com
  • Expense ratio is 0.85%, right in line with what defined-outcome funds in its peer group charge for the same options plumbing.
  • June is one of three siblings on the same equal-weight reference (March and September round it out), so start dates can be laddered instead of hitched to one calendar.ftportfolios.com
  • TBJL Buffer mechanics pointed at 20+ year Treasuries instead of stocks: the first 9% of the reference fund's price decline over the outcome period is absorbed before losses reach you.innovatoretfs.com
  • 0.79% a year undercuts the typical buffer-fund fee, and the fund stands among the stronger implementations in its buffer peer group.
  • Live since 2020, resetting the same July-to-June outcome period year after year, which covers the rate shock that hammered long-duration bonds.

Worth knowing

  • RSJN The buffer is paid for with a ceiling: gains in the underlying ETF above the period's cap don't come through. Terms also reset each June, so entering mid-period changes your effective cap and remaining buffer.ftportfolios.com
  • The target is price return on the underlying ETF, held via FLEX options, so dividends from those 500 companies are not passed through. Income is not part of the design.ftportfolios.com
  • Trading is light next to the biggest buffer funds, so spreads and limit orders matter more here than with a mega-cap-index product.
  • TBJL The price of the buffer is a ceiling. Each period's upside cap is fixed when the period starts, and a Treasury rally beyond it doesn't reach you.innovatoretfs.com
  • It targets the reference fund's price return, so the coupon income a Treasury bond fund passes along isn't part of the package. Distributions have not been part of the pattern.
  • A small, thinly traded fund, so limit orders matter. Buy mid-period and your own buffer and cap differ from the stated terms until the July reset.

Full RSJN profile⁠

Full TBJL profile⁠

RSJN vs TBJL Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

RSJN vs TBJL Cost

Overpaying RSJN vs TBJL

$1,025

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • RSJN 0.85%

    $16,199

  • TBJL 0.79%

    $15,174

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • RSJN 0.85%
  • TBJL 0.79%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530RSJN $16,199TBJL $15,174

Year by year

YearRSJNTBJLOverpaying
10$1,508$1,405$103
20$5,706$5,331$375
30$16,199$15,174$1,025

Expense ratio

  • 0.85%RSJN
  • 0.79%TBJL, cheaper
  • Middle half of Other Buffered funds
  • Median 0.85%

TBJL cheapest of 9 funds

RSJN 3rd cheapest of 9 funds

RSJN vs TBJL Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
RSJN None
TBJL None

Distribution history

RSJNAll RSJN payments⁠

No distribution history available.

TBJLAll TBJL payments⁠

No distribution history available.

RSJN vs TBJL Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
RSJN 7.4%since Jul 2024TBJL 9.2%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
RSJN 0.84since Jul 2024TBJL −0.19
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
RSJN −12.4%since Jun 2024TBJL −28.6%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
RSJN 0.49TBJL 0.41

Popular comparisons

  • RSJNBvsKBFRB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - June · Innovator U.S. Small Cap Managed 10 Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TBJLBvsKBFRB

    Innovator 20+ Year Treasury Bond 9 Buffer ETF - July · Innovator U.S. Small Cap Managed 10 Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RSJNBvsIBUFB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - June · Innovator International Developed 10 Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TBJLBvsIBUFB

    Innovator 20+ Year Treasury Bond 9 Buffer ETF - July · Innovator International Developed 10 Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RSJNBvsRSMRC

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - June · FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - March

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TBJLBvsRSMRC

    Innovator 20+ Year Treasury Bond 9 Buffer ETF - July · FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - March

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.