IBMQ ranks 2nd of 32 funds in the Defined-Maturity Municipal Category.
IBMQ vs MUNG
IBMQ −0.08pt a year
0.10%0.18%
IBMQ 646.3×the volume
129K199
IBMQ vs MUNG Performance
+1.3%+3.7%
- IBMQ 0.10%, better
- MUNG 0.18%
- IBMQ $691M
- MUNG $10M
- IBMQ +2.2%
- MUNG
- IBMQ 2.48%
- MUNG
- IBMQ 2957
- MUNG 183
- IBMQ 129K sh, better
- MUNG 199 sh
- IBMQ $25.44
- MUNG $99.34
ETF.net Grade
- —MUNGNot yet graded
| Pillar | IBMQ | MUNG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A87 | |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | B58 | |
| Tradability | A93 | |
| Holdings | A94 | |
| Durability | A95 |
Rank among Defined-Maturity Municipal funds
Our read on each fund
IBMQA
MUNG—
In short
IBMQ A muni ladder rung in ETF form: thousands of investment-grade bonds that mature or get called by late 2028, then the fund winds up and pays out. AMT-free index, income paid monthly.
Stated mandate
IBMQ The fund seeks to track an index of investment-grade U.S. municipal bonds that are expected to mature or be redeemed before December 2, 2028.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IBMQ vs MUNG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IBMQ vs MUNG Cost
Overpaying MUNG vs IBMQ
$1,643
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IBMQ 0.10%
$2,106
MUNG 0.18%
$3,749
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IBMQ | MUNG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $183 | $328 | $145 |
| 20 | $717 | $1,281 | $564 |
| 30 | $2,106 | $3,749 | $1,643 |
- 0.10%IBMQ, cheaper
- 0.18%MUNG
- Middle half of Defined-Maturity Municipal funds
- Median 0.18%
IBMQ cheapest of 32 funds
MUNG 10th cheapest of 32 funds
IBMQ vs MUNG Dividends
- IBMQ 2.48%
- MUNG
- IBMQ $0.63
- MUNG
- IBMQ $0.06
- MUNG $0.32
- IBMQ Oct 1, 2026
- MUNG Oct 1, 2026
- IBMQ Oct 6, 2026
- MUNG Oct 7, 2026
- IBMQ Monthly
- MUNG Irregular
Distribution history
IBMQ vs MUNG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IBMQ 3.3%MUNG
- Return per unit of risk
- IBMQ −0.14MUNG
- Worst fall
- IBMQ −10.8%MUNG
- Market sensitivity
- IBMQ 0.54MUNG 0.00
Popular comparisons
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.